RadNet, Inc (RDNT) Fair Value & Analysis
Healthcare · US · Market cap $4.3B
Analysis
RadNet, Inc (RDNT) currently trades at $56.20, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $16.85 — implying the stock looks roughly 70.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 85/100 (high quality), in the Healthcare sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).
About the company
RadNet, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, provides outpatient diagnostic imaging services in the United States and internationally. The company operates in two segments, Imaging Centers and Digital Health. Its services include magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, nuclear medicine, mammography, ultrasound, diagnostic radiology, fluoroscopy, and other related procedures, as well as multi-modality imaging services. The company also develops and sells computerized systems that distribute, display, store, and retrieve digital images; picture archiving communications systems and related services; and develops and deploys AI suites to enhance radiologist interpretations of breast, lung, and prostate images, as well as solutions for prostate cancer screening. In addition, it develops and delivers AI-powered health informatics solutions to drive quality, efficiency, and outcomes in imaging and radiology; informatics designed for outpatient radiol…
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.