Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust (XFLT) Fair Value & Analysis

Financial Services · US · Market cap $262M

Price$17.19
Fair Value$11.03
Upside-35.8%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range $8.27 – $13.79

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust (XFLT) currently trades at $17.19, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $11.03 — implying the stock looks roughly 35.8% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Financial Services sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust is headquartered in Chicago, Illinois.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Fondul Proprietatea SA (FP) +53% The Schiehallion Fund Limited (MNTN) +100% BlackRock, Inc (BLK) -97% BH Macro Limited (BHMU) +100% Blackstone Inc (BX) -49% Investor AB (IVSBF) +100%

Frequently asked questions

Is XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust (XFLT) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $11.03 versus a price of $17.19 — about −36% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of XFLT?
Our 21-model fair value for XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust is $11.03 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $17.19.
What is the quality score of XFLT?
XAI Octagon Floating Rate & Alternative Income Trust has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.