EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Lippo China Resources vs McDonald’s: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Lippo China Resources (0156) and McDonald’s (MCD) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: Lippo China Resources trades at HK$1.18 versus a fair value of HK$0.31 (-74%), while McDonald’s trades at $237 versus $163 (-31%).
Lippo China Resources
0156.HK · HKD · Consumer Staples
-74%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$1.18
Fair ValueHK$0.31
Quality49/100
McDonald’s
MCD · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-31%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$237
Fair Value$163
Quality69/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Lippo China ResourcesMcDonald’s
Valuation
n/aP/E (TTM)19.2×
0.16×P/S (TTM)6.11×
0.07×P/BNegative equity
52.5×EV/EBITDA14.0×
n/aPEG2.06×
−73.7%Fair value upside−31.3%
n/aDividend yield3.1%
n/aDividend per share$7.35
Profitability
-2%Operating margin46%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)1.21×
-3%Return on equityNegative equity
-1%Return on assets13%
Growth
13%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
12.5%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)5.1%
5.7%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)7.0%
n/aValue creation/yr+11.8%
Balance & size
n/aInterest coverage (EBIT/interest)7.8×
0.44×Debt / equityNegative equity
$138MMarket cap$169B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy
Valuation multiples (P/E, P/S, P/B, EV/EBITDA) are shown but not scored here: the two companies sit in different sectors, and multiples only compare fairly between similar business models. PEG stays scored, as it relates the P/E to growth.

McDonald’s leads: 1 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Lippo China Resourcesof which business quality 48 · market factors 73 McDonald’sof which business quality 64 · market factors 40
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
10
64
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
64
46
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
30
76
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
44
53
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
98
57
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
72
95
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
65
23
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
89
6
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
88

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyLippo China ResourcesPrice HK$1.18McDonald’sPrice $237
DCF Models-85%below the priceHK$0.18-42%below the price$138
Earnings-Basedn/a-57%below the price$103
Dividend Discountn/a-58%below the price$98.79
Multiplesn/a-5%close to the price$226
Asset-Based+15%above the priceHK$1.36n/a
Growth DCF-82%below the priceHK$0.22-68%below the price$76.46
Economic Profitn/a-52%below the price$114
Growth Earningsn/a-11%close to the price$210
Minimum-85%below the priceHK$0.18-68%below the price$76.46
Maximum+15%above the priceHK$1.36-5%close to the price$226
Median-82%below the priceHK$0.22-52%below the price$114
Geometric mean-69%below the priceHK$0.37-46%below the price$128

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Lippo China Resources: 8 of 9 models see the stock below the current price.

McDonald’s: 19 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Lippo China Resources
Price HK$1.18
Fair Value HK$0.31
Bear HK$0.06Bull HK$0.68
McDonald’s
Price $237
Fair Value $163
Bear $91.85Bull $252

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Lippo China Resources · Consumer Staples

Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-74% · bottom 25%

McDonald’s · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score69 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-31% · below median

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees McDonald’s as the less overvalued of the two: Lippo China Resources trades at HK$1.18 versus a fair value of HK$0.31 (-74%), while McDonald’s trades at $237 versus $163 (-31%).

McDonald’s has the higher quality score (69/100).

Open McDonald’s live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.