EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Finance Investment Holdings vs Archer-Daniels-Midland: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Finance Investment Holdings (0875) and Archer-Daniels-Midland (ADM) compare, as of Aug 5, 2026.

As of Aug 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Archer-Daniels-Midland as the less overvalued of the two: China Finance Investment Holdings trades at HK$0.31 versus a fair value of HK$0.05 (-84%), while Archer-Daniels-Midland trades at $79.27 versus $49.20 (-38%).
China Finance Investment Holdings
0875.HK · HKD · Consumer Staples
-84%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.31
Fair ValueHK$0.05
Quality26/100
Archer-Daniels-Midland
ADM · USD · Consumer Staples
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$79.27
Fair Value$49.20
Quality70/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China Finance Investment HoldingsArcher-Daniels-Midland
Valuation
—P/E (TTM)36.6×
0.01×P/S (TTM)0.49×
1.37×P/B1.74×
—EV/EBITDA18.2×
—PEG2.49×
—Dividend yield2.5%
—Dividend per share$2.05
Profitability
-12%Net margin1%
-3%Operating margin1%
-191%Return on equity5%
-3%Return on assets2%
Growth
212%Revenue growth (YoY)2%
52.4%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-7.5%
60.8%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)4.5%
Balance & size
—Debt / equity0.34×
$48MMarket cap$40B
mixedGrowth qualitymixed

China Finance Investment Holdings leads: 5 to 4 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Finance Investment Holdingsof which business quality 21 · market factors 33 Archer-Daniels-Midlandof which business quality 64 · market factors 77
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
21
41
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
54
47
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
4
60
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
1
61
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
67
100
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
83
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
30
69
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
21
86
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
5
99

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China Finance Investment Holdings

Asset-BasedHK$0.03

1 of 1 models see the stock below the current price.

Archer-Daniels-Midland

DCF Models$68.76
Earnings-Based$14.95
Dividend Discount$29.69
Multiples$38.76
Asset-Based$31.60
Growth DCF$86.34
Economic Profit$25.96
Growth Earnings$36.23

22 of 25 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China Finance Investment Holdings
Bear HK$0.03Fair Value HK$0.05Bull HK$0.06
HK$0.31 = current price (white tick)
Archer-Daniels-Midland
Bear $36.90Fair Value $49.20Bull $61.50
$79.27 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Finance Investment Holdings · Consumer Staples

Quality score26 · bottom 25%
Fair value upside-84% · bottom 25%

Archer-Daniels-Midland · Consumer Staples

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Archer-Daniels-Midland as the less overvalued of the two: China Finance Investment Holdings trades at HK$0.31 versus a fair value of HK$0.05 (-84%), while Archer-Daniels-Midland trades at $79.27 versus $49.20 (-38%).

Archer-Daniels-Midland has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →
China Finance Investment Holdings · Archer-Daniels-Midland

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to China Finance Investment Holdings

Walmart vs AltriaCostco Wholesale vs AltriaCoca-Cola vs AltriaProcter & Gamble vs Altria

Related to Archer-Daniels-Midland

Philip Morris International vs AltriaAlphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEase
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.