EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Cinese International Group Holdings vs Booking Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Cinese International Group Holdings (1620) and Booking Holdings (BKNG) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Booking Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Cinese International Group Holdings trades at HK$0.12 versus a fair value of HK$0.06 (-51%), while Booking Holdings trades at $212 versus $153 (-28%).
Cinese International Group Holdings
1620.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-51%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.12
Fair ValueHK$0.06
Quality61/100
Booking Holdings
BKNG · USD · Consumer Discretionary
-28%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$212
Fair Value$153
Quality88/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

Cinese International Group HoldingsBooking Holdings
Valuation
P/E (TTM)24.1×
0.25×P/S (TTM)5.12×
1.36×P/B
3.4×EV/EBITDA13.6×
PEG0.75×
Dividend yield0.9%
Dividend per share$1.58
Profitability
18%Net margin22%
5%Operating margin25%
-6%Return on equity226%
3%Return on assets22%
Growth
-5%Revenue growth (YoY)16%
10.9%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)16.3%
3.9%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)31.7%
Balance & size
$15MMarket cap$142B
expensiveGrowth qualityhealthy

Booking Holdings leads: 2 to 7 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Cinese International Group Holdingsof which business quality 59 · market factors 49 Booking Holdingsof which business quality 84 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
84
87
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
60
43
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
96
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
54
83
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
100
92
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
50
55
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
54
61
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
40
55
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
82
100

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

Cinese International Group Holdings

DCF ModelsHK$0.10
Earnings-BasedHK$0.05
MultiplesHK$0.05
Asset-BasedHK$0.01
Economic ProfitHK$0.04
Growth EarningsHK$0.15

11 of 13 models see the stock below the current price.

Booking Holdings

DCF Models$253
Earnings-Based$132
Dividend Discount$28.34
Multiples$153
Growth DCF$231
Economic Profit$113
Growth Earnings$187

14 of 23 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

Cinese International Group Holdings
Bear HK$0.04Fair Value HK$0.06Bull HK$0.17
HK$0.12 = current price (white tick)
Booking Holdings
Bear $114Fair Value $153Bull $192
$212 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Cinese International Group Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score61 · above median
Fair value upside-51% · bottom 25%

Booking Holdings · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score88 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-28% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Booking Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: Cinese International Group Holdings trades at HK$0.12 versus a fair value of HK$0.06 (-51%), while Booking Holdings trades at $212 versus $153 (-28%).

Booking Holdings has the higher quality score (88/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.