EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co vs Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co (603129) and Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co (603787) compare, as of Sep 25, 2026.

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co trades at ¥291 versus a fair value of ¥465 (+60%), while Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co trades at ¥10.46 versus ¥3.83 (-63%).
Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co
603129.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
+60%
upside to fair value
undervalued
Price¥291
Fair Value¥465
Quality66/100
Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co
603787.SHG · CNY · Consumer Discretionary
-63%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price¥10.46
Fair Value¥3.83
Quality55/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

Zhejiang CFMoto Power CoJiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co
Valuation
26.6×P/E (TTM)52.3×
2.13×P/S (TTM)0.60×
5.91×P/B1.58×
17.6×EV/EBITDA14.7×
+60.1%Fair value upside−63.4%
1.4%Dividend yield2.9%
¥4.20Dividend per share¥0.30
Profitability
12%Operating margin-0%
1.00×EBIT margin trend (5Y)0.52×
23%Return on equity3%
6%Return on assets-0%
Growth
26%Revenue growth (YoY)-11%
20.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)-5.7%
34.3%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-4.1%
+38.3%Value creation/yr−5.4%
Balance & size
62.0×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)266.9×
0.00×Debt / equityn/a
$7BMarket cap$359M
healthyGrowth qualityweak

Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co leads: 9 to 5 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

Zhejiang CFMoto Power Coof which business quality 69 · market factors 63 Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Coof which business quality 55 · market factors 37
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
61
38
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
54
60
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
80
35
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
90
70
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
30
78
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
71
75
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
61
25
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
56
13
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
78
68

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyZhejiang CFMoto Power CoPrice ¥291Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle CoPrice ¥10.46
DCF Models+67%above the price¥486-73%below the price¥2.79
Earnings-Based+18%above the price¥343-70%below the price¥3.14
Dividend Discount-78%below the price¥63.34-79%below the price¥2.19
Multiples-27%below the price¥212-57%below the price¥4.47
Asset-Based-89%below the price¥32.75-58%below the price¥4.43
Growth DCF+79%above the price¥519n/a
Economic Profit-55%below the price¥130-64%below the price¥3.81
Growth Earnings+60%above the price¥465-63%below the price¥3.83
Minimum-89%below the price¥32.75-79%below the price¥2.19
Maximum+79%above the price¥519-57%below the price¥4.47
Median-5%close to the price¥277-64%below the price¥3.81
Geometric mean-32%below the price¥197-67%below the price¥3.43

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co: 12 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co: 15 of 16 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co
Price ¥291
Fair Value ¥465
Bear ¥294Bull ¥605
Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co
Price ¥10.46
Fair Value ¥3.83
Bear ¥2.68Bull ¥4.98

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score66 · Top 25%
Fair value upside+60% · Top 25%

Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside-63% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 25, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co as the more attractively valued of the two: Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co trades at ¥291 versus a fair value of ¥465 (+60%), while Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co trades at ¥10.46 versus ¥3.83 (-63%).

Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co has the higher quality score (66/100).

Open Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co live analysis →
Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co · Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Related to Zhejiang CFMoto Power Co

Amazon.com vs Alibaba Group HoldingAmazon.com vs Toyota Motor CorporationAmazon.com vs Booking HoldingsAmazon.com vs Sony Group

Related to Jiangsu Xinri E-Vehicle Co

Alibaba Group Holding vs TeslaToyota Motor Corporation vs TeslaBooking Holdings vs TeslaMicrosoft vs Nvidia
Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.