EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

GameSparcs Co vs Konami Holdings: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how GameSparcs Co (6542) and Konami Holdings (KNM) compare, as of Sep 14, 2026.

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Konami Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: GameSparcs Co trades at TWD 42.85 versus a fair value of TWD 10.64 (-75%), while Konami Holdings trades at £207 versus £65.48 (-68%).
GameSparcs Co
6542.TWO · TWD · Communication Services
-75%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceTWD 42.85
Fair ValueTWD 10.64
Quality55/100
Konami Holdings
KNM.LSE · GBP · Communication Services
-68%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price£207
Fair Value£65.48
Quality74/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

GameSparcs CoKonami Holdings
Valuation
P/E (TTM)0.3×
0.07×P/S (TTM)
0.08×P/B
PEG2.12×
−75.2%Fair value upside−68.4%
0.0%Dividend yield1.2%
TWD 0.02Dividend per share£222
Profitability
-3%Operating margin24%
0.10×EBIT margin trend (5Y)2.17×
-1%Return on equity19%
0%Return on assets12%
Growth
21%Revenue growth (YoY)27%
4.2%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)16.2%
1.1%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)12.6%
−55.1%Value creation/yr+26.6%
Balance & size
13.5×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)303.6×
Debt / equity0.07×
$61MMarket cap$3.5T
weakGrowth qualityhealthy

Konami Holdings leads: 0 to 10 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

GameSparcs Coof which business quality 55 · market factors 40 Konami Holdingsof which business quality 73 · market factors 58
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
66
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
37
74
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
0
65
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
100
99
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
90
40
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
76
53
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
30
58
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
16
64
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
82
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyGameSparcs CoPrice TWD 42.85Konami HoldingsPrice £207
DCF Models-56%below the priceTWD 18.91+6798%above the price£14,300
Earnings-Based-79%below the priceTWD 8.96+3470%above the price£7,401
Dividend Discount-61%below the priceTWD 16.52+1494%above the price£3,304
Multiples-77%below the priceTWD 9.98+6962%above the price£14,639
Asset-Based-72%below the priceTWD 12.16+1246%above the price£2,790
Growth DCFn/a+6122%above the price£12,899
Economic Profit-67%below the priceTWD 14.05+4393%above the price£9,313
Growth Earnings-99%below the priceTWD 0.37+6480%above the price£13,641
Minimum-99%below the priceTWD 0.37+1246%above the price£2,790
Maximum-56%below the priceTWD 18.91+6962%above the price£14,639
Median-72%below the priceTWD 12.16+5257%above the price£11,106
Geometric mean-82%below the priceTWD 7.81+3923%above the price£8,340

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

GameSparcs Co: 15 of 15 models see the stock below the current price.

Konami Holdings: 0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

GameSparcs Co
Price TWD 42.85
Fair Value TWD 10.64
Bear TWD 10.09Bull TWD 10.64
Konami Holdings
Price £207
Fair Value £65.48
Bear £45.83Bull £97.39

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

GameSparcs Co · Communication Services

Quality score55 · above median
Fair value upside-75% · bottom 25%

Konami Holdings · Communication Services

Quality score74 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-68% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Sep 14, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Konami Holdings as the less overvalued of the two: GameSparcs Co trades at TWD 42.85 versus a fair value of TWD 10.64 (-75%), while Konami Holdings trades at £207 versus £65.48 (-68%).

Konami Holdings has the higher quality score (74/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.