EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

China Brilliant Global vs Compagnie Financière Richemont: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how China Brilliant Global (8026) and Compagnie Financière Richemont (CFR) compare, as of Aug 17, 2026.

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Compagnie Financière Richemont as the less overvalued of the two: China Brilliant Global trades at HK$0.30 versus a fair value of HK$0.14 (-53%), while Compagnie Financière Richemont trades at CHF 192 versus CHF 119 (-38%).
China Brilliant Global
8026.HK · HKD · Consumer Discretionary
-53%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceHK$0.30
Fair ValueHK$0.14
Quality49/100
Compagnie Financière Richemont
CFR.SW · CHF · Consumer Discretionary
-38%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceCHF 192
Fair ValueCHF 119
Quality70/100

Head-to-head numbers

Green value = the better side for that row (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper).

China Brilliant GlobalCompagnie Financière Richemont
Valuation
28.0×P/E (TTM)36.2×
0.52×P/S (TTM)6.31×
0.16×P/B5.85×
EV/EBITDA25.6×
PEG2.63×
Dividend yield2.0%
Dividend per shareCHF 3.57
Profitability
9%Net margin16%
19%Operating margin19%
3%Return on equity15%
2%Return on assets7%
Growth
4%Revenue growth (YoY)4%
4.1%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)4.0%
12.4%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)11.3%
Balance & size
Debt / equity0.19×
$55MMarket cap$141B
mixedGrowth qualityhealthy

Even match: 5 to 5 metric wins.

Dash = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

China Brilliant Globalof which business quality 51 · market factors 39 Compagnie Financière Richemontof which business quality 67 · market factors 77
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
24
55
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
53
39
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
64
72
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
71
79
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
33
79
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
30
62
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
41
79
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
45
92
Net IssuanceBuybacks instead of dilution
54
77

What the models say

The median fair value (base case) per model family, each in the currency of its trading venue. Green = above the current price, red = below.

China Brilliant Global

DCF ModelsHK$0.18
Earnings-BasedHK$0.10
MultiplesHK$0.13
Asset-BasedHK$0.15
Growth DCFHK$0.16
Economic ProfitHK$0.13
Growth EarningsHK$0.12

24 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.

Compagnie Financière Richemont

DCF ModelsCHF 144
Earnings-BasedCHF 64.00
Dividend DiscountCHF 61.54
MultiplesCHF 127
Asset-BasedCHF 30.31
Growth DCFCHF 109
Economic ProfitCHF 75.58
Growth EarningsCHF 128

26 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear case to the optimistic bull case. The white tick is the current price: left of fair value means room to run.

China Brilliant Global
Bear HK$0.10Fair Value HK$0.14Bull HK$0.17
HK$0.30 = current price (white tick)
Compagnie Financière Richemont
Bear CHF 86.99Fair Value CHF 119Bull CHF 151
CHF 192 = current price (white tick)

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

China Brilliant Global · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score49 · below median
Fair value upside-53% · bottom 25%

Compagnie Financière Richemont · Consumer Discretionary

Quality score70 · Top 25%
Fair value upside-38% · below median

Bottom line

As of Aug 17, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Compagnie Financière Richemont as the less overvalued of the two: China Brilliant Global trades at HK$0.30 versus a fair value of HK$0.14 (-53%), while Compagnie Financière Richemont trades at CHF 192 versus CHF 119 (-38%).

Compagnie Financière Richemont has the higher quality score (70/100).

See the full analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 21 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.