EN DE
STOCK COMPARISON

ConocoPhillips vs Tomer Energy Royalties 2012: Fair Value & Quality

Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how ConocoPhillips (COP) and Tomer Energy Royalties 2012 (TOEN) compare, as of Oct 5, 2026.

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ConocoPhillips as the less overvalued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $127 versus a fair value of $91.42 (−27.9%), while Tomer Energy Royalties 2012 trades at ILS 15.60 versus ILS 7.43 (−52.4%).
ConocoPhillips
COP · USD · Energy
−27.9%
upside to fair value
overvalued
Price$127
Fair Value$91.42
Quality65/100
Tomer Energy Royalties 2012
TOEN.TA · ILA · Energy
−52.4%
upside to fair value
overvalued
PriceILS 15.60
Fair ValueILS 7.43
Quality72/100
Get comparisons like this free by email every month: the most undervalued quality stocks.

Head-to-head numbers

Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.

betterweakerfor reference, not scored

ConocoPhillipsTomer Energy Royalties 2012
Valuation
16.5×P/E (TTM)17.5×
20.6×P/E ex one-offs (FY2025)n/a
13.1×Forward P/E (FY2027)n/a
12.2×Median P/E at FY-end (8 FY, ex one-offs where documented)n/a
2.39×P/S (TTM)3.81×
2.39×P/B1.10× · book value is mostly goodwill
6.3×EV/EBITDA10.8×
1.08×PEGn/a
−27.9%Fair value upside−52.4%
2.6%Dividend yield2.4%
$3.30Dividend per sharen/a
Profitability
31.5%Operating margin29.6%
n/aEBIT margin trend (5Y)0.75×
14.2%Return on equity6.1%
7.5%Return on assets3.2%
Growth
35.5%Revenue growth (YoY)11.6%
-9.3%Avg. growth/yr (3Y)13.9%
25.6%Avg. growth/yr (5Y)-1.2%
+3.8%Value creation/yr−8.2%
Balance & size
9.3×Interest coverage (EBIT/interest)1.8×
0.34×Debt / equity0.60×
$154BMarket cap$102M
weakGrowth qualitymixed
The P/E excluding one-off items is only shown where the special items are documented in the accounts (our own raw data or SEC filings). If one side lacks it, the reported P/E stays scored.
ConocoPhillips, median P/E at fiscal year-end, 8 fiscal years (2017 to 2025), reported earnings, 4 of the years ex one-offs: 12.2.
Forward P/E: price divided by the analyst consensus for the first fiscal year that has not started yet. The current year carries special items from quarters already reported.

ConocoPhillips leads: 11 to 2 metric wins.

n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.

Quality in detail

The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.

ConocoPhillipsof which business quality 66 · market factors 73 Tomer Energy Royalties 2012of which business quality 68 · market factors 28
ProfitabilityMargins and returns on capital today
42
36
Quality GrowthAre margins and returns improving?
31
58
CashflowEarnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
96
99
Fin. StrengthBalance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
70
52
InvestmentDisciplined investing over empire-building
62
98
Low VolatilityCalm price path (market factor)
82
67
MomentumPrice trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
66
18
52W MomentumDistance to the 52-week high (market factor)
75
2
Net IssuanceShare count: buybacks or dilution?
91
82

What the models say

How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.

above the price, more than 15% above close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price below the price, more than 15% below

Model familyConocoPhillipsPrice $127Tomer Energy Royalties 2012Price ILS 15.60
DCF Models+12.0%close to the price$142−44.0%below the priceILS 8.73
Earnings-Based−66.1%below the price$42.94−70.5%below the priceILS 4.60
Dividend Discount−56.0%below the price$55.75−42.6%below the priceILS 8.96
Multiples−30.6%below the price$87.97−63.8%below the priceILS 5.64
Asset-Based−71.6%below the price$35.97−39.4%below the priceILS 9.45
Growth DCF+27.5%above the price$162−10.4%close to the priceILS 13.97
Economic Profit−56.7%below the price$54.89−60.4%below the priceILS 6.17
Growth Earnings−34.7%below the price$82.81−38.1%below the priceILS 9.65
Minimum−71.6%below the price$35.97−70.5%below the priceILS 4.60
Maximum+27.5%above the price$162−10.4%close to the priceILS 13.97
Median−45.3%below the price$69.28−43.3%below the priceILS 8.84
Geometric mean−42.6%below the price$72.81−49.0%below the priceILS 7.95

Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.

ConocoPhillips: 20 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.

Tomer Energy Royalties 2012: 21 of 21 models see the stock below the current price.

Scenario ranges

From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.

ConocoPhillips
Price $127
Fair Value $91.42
Bear $68.56Bull $114
Tomer Energy Royalties 2012
Price ILS 15.60
Fair Value ILS 7.43
Bear ILS 6.09Bull ILS 9.89

Compare two other stocks

Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.

Free, no sign-up

Ranked within their sector

Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.

ConocoPhillips · Energy

Quality score65 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−27.9% · below median

Tomer Energy Royalties 2012 · Energy

Quality score72 · Top 25%
Fair value upside−52.4% · bottom 25%

Bottom line

As of Oct 5, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees ConocoPhillips as the less overvalued of the two: ConocoPhillips trades at $127 versus a fair value of $91.42 (−27.9%), while Tomer Energy Royalties 2012 trades at ILS 15.60 versus ILS 7.43 (−52.4%).

Tomer Energy Royalties 2012 has the higher quality score (72/100).

Open ConocoPhillips live analysis →

More comparisons

Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.

Free · Top-25 report

See the undervalued quality stocks every month

Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.

A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.