Konami Holdings vs Paradox Interactive AB (publ): Fair Value & Quality
Both stocks run through our valuation models. Here is how Konami Holdings (KNM) and Paradox Interactive AB (publ) (PDX) compare, as of Sep 24, 2026.
Head-to-head numbers
Green is the better side of a row, red the weaker one (for valuation multiples: lower = cheaper). Grey rows are for reference only and are not scored.
betterweakerfor reference, not scored
Konami Holdings leads: 7 to 2 metric wins.
n/a = not meaningfully computable, for example with negative equity.
Quality in detail
The quality score, broken down into the same factor families as on the stock page, 0 to 100 per family.
What the models say
How far the median fair value (base case) per model family sits from the current price, in percent. The amount in the currency of the trading venue is shown underneath.
▲above the price, more than 15% above ●close to the price, 85% to 115% of the price ▼below the price, more than 15% below
| Model family | Konami HoldingsPrice £211 | Paradox Interactive AB (publ)Price SEK 157 |
|---|---|---|
| DCF Models | ▲+6699%above the price£14,315 | ●+9%close to the priceSEK 171 |
| Earnings-Based | ▲+3415%above the price£7,401 | ▼-86%below the priceSEK 21.35 |
| Dividend Discount | ▲+1469%above the price£3,304 | n/a |
| Multiples | ▲+6853%above the price£14,639 | ▼-80%below the priceSEK 31.17 |
| Asset-Based | ▲+1225%above the price£2,790 | ▼-90%below the priceSEK 15.85 |
| Growth DCF | ▲+6039%above the price£12,926 | ●+2%close to the priceSEK 160 |
| Economic Profit | ▲+4323%above the price£9,313 | ▼-86%below the priceSEK 22.19 |
| Growth Earnings | ▲+6379%above the price£13,641 | ▼-84%below the priceSEK 25.76 |
| Minimum | ▲+1225%above the price£2,790 | ▼-90%below the priceSEK 15.85 |
| Maximum | ▲+6853%above the price£14,639 | ●+9%close to the priceSEK 171 |
| Median | ▲+5181%above the price£11,120 | ▼-84%below the priceSEK 25.76 |
| Geometric mean | ▲+3863%above the price£8,343 | ▼-74%below the priceSEK 40.04 |
Minimum, maximum, median and geometric mean refer to the family values in this table. Geometric because deviations are ratios: half the price and twice the price average to 100%, not 125%.
Konami Holdings: 0 of 26 models see the stock below the current price.
Paradox Interactive AB (publ): 18 of 24 models see the stock below the current price.
Scenario ranges
From our cautious bear scenario to the optimistic bull scenario. The white tick is the current price (value above it), the green tick the fair value (value below it): if the price sits left of the fair value, there is room to rise.
Compare two other stocks
Tap a field and type again, ticker or company name.
Ranked within their sector
Where each stock sits within its sector peer group. Band = middle 50% of peers, tick = median, dot = this stock.
Konami Holdings · Communication Services
Paradox Interactive AB (publ) · Communication Services
Bottom line
As of Sep 24, 2026, Fair Value Calculator sees Paradox Interactive AB (publ) as the less overvalued of the two: Konami Holdings trades at £211 versus a fair value of £65.48 (-69%), while Paradox Interactive AB (publ) trades at SEK 157 versus SEK 94.07 (-40%).
Konami Holdings has the higher quality score (74/100).
Open Paradox Interactive AB (publ) live analysis →More comparisons
Popular match-ups from the same sectors, all with fair value and quality score.
Related to Konami Holdings
Alphabet Inc Class C vs Meta PlatformsAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetflixAlphabet Inc Class C vs Verizon CommunicationsAlphabet Inc Class C vs T-Mobile USRelated to Paradox Interactive AB (publ)
Alphabet Inc Class C vs At&tAlphabet Inc Class C vs Spotify TechnologyAlphabet Inc Class C vs NetEaseMeta Platforms vs NetflixSee the undervalued quality stocks every month
Just your email for the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks, with fair value, quality and price target. Plus 14 days of Pro to try, no card.
Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click. Not financial advice.
A model-based valuation snapshot from 26 models. Values change with price and fundamentals; the date shown above applies.