1420 (1420) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$262M

1 1420 1420 · HK

PriceHK$0.1950

Fair ValueHK$0.2500

Upside+28.2%

Quality59/100

Watch 1420 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.1400 – HK$0.3700

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated yesterday

Share price −7.1% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1300 – HK$0.3100 · fair‑value band HK$0.1400 – HK$0.3700 · the HK$0.1950 price screens below the HK$0.2500 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1420 (1420) currently trades at HK$0.1950, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.2500 — implying the stock looks roughly 28.2% undervalued today. We read business quality at 59/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1420 generated revenue of HK$170M at a net margin of 11.2%. Revenue grew 43.5% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 16.8%. Net debt stands at HK$14.0M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$170M

Revenue growth (YoY) +43.5%

Net margin 11.2%

Return on equity 16.8%

Free cash flow HK$13.2M FY2025

P/E ratio 2.2

More key figures

Operating margin 14.7%

EPS growth (YoY) +121%

Net debt HK$14.0M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1420 reported revenue of HK$168M in FY2025 versus HK$85.4M in FY2021, a compound +18.4%/yr. Reported net income was HK$18.7M in FY2025, compounding +87.9%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +18.4%/yr

FY21 HK$85.4M

FY22 HK$88.6M

FY23 HK$121M

FY24 HK$144M

FY25 HK$168M

Net income +87.9%/yr

FY21 HK$1.5M

FY22 HK$1.7M

FY23 HK$3.2M

FY24 HK$8.1M

FY25 HK$18.7M

Is 1420 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$0.4415	$0.5700	+29%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	520,000 KRW	268,469 KRW	-48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.65	¥17.35	+273%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	4,541 MXN	-40%
Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co 000720	127,800 KRW	55,602 KRW	-56%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,195 TWD	1,681 TWD	+41%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1420 (1420) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.2500 versus a price of HK$0.1950 — about +28% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1420?

Our model-based fair value for 1420 is HK$0.2500 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1950.

What is the quality score of 1420?

1420 has a Quality Score of 59/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1420 (1420)?

1420 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$170M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1420?

The net profit margin of 1420 is about 11.2%, meaning it keeps roughly 11.2% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.