1637 (1637) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$162M

1 1637 1637 · HK

PriceHK$0.4100

Fair ValueHK$0.3300

Upside-19.5%

Quality71/100

Watch 1637 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.2800 – HK$0.3900

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 22 valuation models · updated today

Share price −16.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1300 – HK$0.5138 · fair‑value band HK$0.2800 – HK$0.3900 · the HK$0.4100 price screens above the HK$0.3300 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1637 (1637) currently trades at HK$0.4100, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.3300 — implying the stock looks roughly 19.5% overvalued today. We read business quality at 71/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1637 generated revenue of HK$388M at a net margin of 1.5%. Revenue declined 19.7% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 2.6%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$149M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$388M

Revenue growth (YoY) -19.7%

Net margin 1.5%

Return on equity 2.6%

Free cash flow HK$88.5M FY2025

P/E ratio 20.3

More key figures

Operating margin 4.8%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0300

EPS growth (YoY) -29.9%

Net cash HK$149M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

1637 reported revenue of HK$388M in FY2026 versus HK$753M in FY2022, a compound −15.3%/yr. Reported net income was HK$6.0M in FY2026, compounding −15.5%/yr from FY2022.

Revenue −15.3%/yr

FY22 HK$753M

FY23 HK$954M

FY24 HK$876M

FY25 HK$608M

FY26 HK$388M

Net income −15.5%/yr

FY22 HK$11.7M

FY23 −HK$11.0M

FY24 −HK$15.2M

FY25 HK$5.4M

FY26 HK$6.0M

Is 1637 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$42.70	$34.33	-20%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	460,500 KRW	206,212 KRW	-55%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.72	¥16.90	+258%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	4,541 MXN	-40%
000720 000720	127,800 KRW	55,602 KRW	-56%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,195 TWD	1,681 TWD	+41%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1637 (1637) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.3300 versus a price of HK$0.4100 — about −20% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1637?

Our model-based fair value for 1637 is HK$0.3300 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.4100.

What is the quality score of 1637?

1637 has a Quality Score of 71/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1637 (1637)?

1637 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$388M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1637?

The net profit margin of 1637 is about 1.5%, meaning it keeps roughly 1.5% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.