Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1647 (1647) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$59.8M

1 1647 1647 · HK
PriceHK$0.0450
Fair ValueHK$0.0338
Upside-25.0%
Quality49/100
Watch 1647 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0293 – HK$0.0338

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 2 valuation models · updated today

Share price −23.9% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.1191 HK$0.0388 Fair Value HK$0.0338 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.0388 – HK$0.1191 · fair‑value band HK$0.0293 – HK$0.0338 · the HK$0.0450 price screens above the HK$0.0338 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1647 (1647) currently trades at HK$0.0450, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0338 — implying the stock looks roughly 25.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 49/100 (below-average quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1647 generated revenue of HK$105M at a net margin of 0.6%. Revenue declined 9.0% year over year. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$11.2M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$105M
Revenue growth (YoY) -9.0%
Net margin 0.6%
Return on equity 0.0%
Free cash flow −HK$5.1M FY2025
Operating margin -2.6%
More key figures
EPS growth (YoY) -50.7%
Net cash HK$11.2M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1647 reported revenue of HK$110M in FY2025 versus HK$49.1M in FY2021, a compound +22.2%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$1.0M in FY2025.

Revenue +22.2%/yr
FY21 HK$49.1M
FY22 HK$44.7M
FY23 HK$57.8M
FY24 HK$84.5M
FY25 HK$110M
Net income
FY21 HK$5.3M
FY22 −HK$982K
FY23 −HK$6.4M
FY24 HK$2.2M
FY25 −HK$1.0M

Is 1647 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD $0.4415 $0.5700 +29%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260 520,000 KRW 268,469 KRW -48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668 ¥4.65 ¥17.35 +273%
TopBuild Corp BLD 7,547 MXN 324.01 MXN -96%
000720 000720 130,300 KRW 55,602 KRW -57%
United Integrated Services Co 2404 1,205 TWD 1,891 TWD +57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1647 (1647) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0338 versus a price of HK$0.0450 — about −25% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1647?
Our model-based fair value for 1647 is HK$0.0338 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.0450.
What is the quality score of 1647?
1647 has a Quality Score of 49/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1647 (1647)?
1647 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$105M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1647?
The net profit margin of 1647 is about 0.6%, meaning it keeps roughly 0.6% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.