1727 (1727) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$437M

1 1727 1727 · HK

PriceHK$0.2480

Fair ValueHK$0.2026

Upside-18.3%

Quality39/100

Watch 1727 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$0.1515 – HK$0.3023

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 3 valuation models · updated today

Share price −2.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.2260 – HK$0.5900 · fair‑value band HK$0.1515 – HK$0.3023 · the HK$0.2480 price screens above the HK$0.2026 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1727 (1727) currently trades at HK$0.2480, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.2026 — implying the stock looks roughly 18.3% overvalued today. We read business quality at 39/100 (below-average quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1727 generated revenue of HK$15.5B at a net margin of -3.8%. Revenue declined 46.1% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -9.8%. Net debt stands at HK$3.0B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$15.5B

Revenue growth (YoY) -46.1%

Net margin -3.8%

Return on equity -9.8%

Free cash flow −HK$2.2B FY2025

Operating margin -2.5%

More key figures

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0600

EPS growth (YoY) -17.6%

Net debt HK$3.0B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1727 reported revenue of HK$15.5B in FY2025 versus HK$47.8B in FY2021, a compound −24.6%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$580M in FY2025.

Revenue −24.6%/yr

FY21 HK$47.8B

FY22 HK$40.0B

FY23 HK$33.5B

FY24 HK$25.1B

FY25 HK$15.5B

Net income

FY21 −HK$346M

FY22 HK$327M

FY23 HK$171M

FY24 HK$171M

FY25 −HK$580M

Is 1727 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$42.70	$34.33	-20%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	460,500 KRW	206,212 KRW	-55%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.72	¥16.90	+258%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	4,541 MXN	-40%
Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co 000720	127,800 KRW	55,602 KRW	-56%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,260 TWD	1,431 TWD	+14%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1727 (1727) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.2026 versus a price of HK$0.2480 — about −18% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1727?

Our model-based fair value for 1727 is HK$0.2026 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.2480.

What is the quality score of 1727?

1727 has a Quality Score of 39/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1727 (1727)?

1727 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$15.5B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1727?

The net profit margin of 1727 is about -3.8%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.