1749 (1749) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · Market cap HK$61.4M

1 1749 1749 · HK

PriceHK$0.4600

Fair ValueHK$1.01

Upside+119.6%

Quality37/100

Watch 1749 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.7500 – HK$1.26

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 14 valuation models · updated today

Share price −20.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.4600 – HK$1.07 · fair‑value band HK$0.7500 – HK$1.26 · the HK$0.4600 price screens below the HK$1.01 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1749 (1749) currently trades at HK$0.4600, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.01 — implying the stock looks roughly 119.6% undervalued today. We read business quality at 37/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1749 generated revenue of HK$863M at a net margin of 0.9%. Revenue declined 17.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 2.9%. Net debt stands at HK$132M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$863M

Revenue growth (YoY) -17.6%

Net margin 0.9%

Return on equity 2.9%

Free cash flow −HK$47.7M FY2025

P/E ratio 6.6

More key figures

Operating margin -0.8%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0900

EPS growth (YoY) -8.6%

Net debt HK$132M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1749 reported revenue of HK$863M in FY2025 versus HK$993M in FY2021, a compound −3.5%/yr. Reported net income was HK$7.9M in FY2025, compounding −10.6%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −3.5%/yr

FY21 HK$993M

FY22 HK$881M

FY23 HK$1.1B

FY24 HK$1.0B

FY25 HK$863M

Net income −10.6%/yr

FY21 HK$12.4M

FY22 HK$16.0M

FY23 HK$31.6M

FY24 HK$33.2M

FY25 HK$7.9M

Is 1749 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Apparel Manufacturing stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
H & M Hennes & Mauritz AB HNNMY	$3.58	$3.95	+10%
Ralph Lauren Corporation RL	$366.55	$365.78	-0%
Moncler S.p.A MONC	€50.90	€50.69	-0%
Gildan Activewear Inc GIL	$52.09	$33.02	-37%
LPP SA LPP	21,720 PLN	18,670 PLN	-14%
Levi Strauss & Co LEVI	$22.53	$56.56	+151%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Cyclical stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1749 (1749) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.01 versus a price of HK$0.4600 — about +120% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1749?

Our model-based fair value for 1749 is HK$1.01 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.4600.

What is the quality score of 1749?

1749 has a Quality Score of 37/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1749 (1749)?

1749 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$863M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1749?

The net profit margin of 1749 is about 0.9%, meaning it keeps roughly 0.9% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.