Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1847 (1847) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · Market cap HK$214M

1 1847 1847 · HK
PriceHK$0.4800
Fair ValueHK$0.3200
Upside-33.3%
Quality51/100
Watch 1847 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.3200 – HK$0.6500

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 9 valuation models · updated today

Share price +5.5% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$1.14 HK$0.4050 Fair Value HK$0.3200 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.4050 – HK$1.14 · fair‑value band HK$0.3200 – HK$0.6500 · the HK$0.4800 price screens above the HK$0.3200 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1847 (1847) currently trades at HK$0.4800, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.3200 — implying the stock looks roughly 33.3% overvalued today. We read business quality at 51/100 (solid quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1847 generated revenue of HK$1.2B at a net margin of -13.3%. Revenue grew 69.8% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -14.3%. Net debt stands at HK$345M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.2B
Revenue growth (YoY) +69.8%
Net margin -13.3%
Return on equity -14.3%
Free cash flow HK$32.5M FY2025
Operating margin -26.3%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0400
EPS growth (YoY) +34.4%
Net debt HK$345M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1847 reported revenue of HK$1.2B in FY2025 versus HK$2.1B in FY2021, a compound −13.8%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$154M in FY2025.

Revenue −13.8%/yr
FY21 HK$2.1B
FY22 HK$1.7B
FY23 HK$1.4B
FY24 HK$709M
FY25 HK$1.2B
Net income
FY21 HK$701K
FY22 HK$27.2M
FY23 −HK$34.1M
FY24 −HK$112M
FY25 −HK$154M

Is 1847 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Building Materials stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
CRH plc CRH $99.98 $57.88 -42%
Holcim AG HCMLY $19.20 $8.68 -55%
Heidelberg Materials AG HEI €183.70 €168.14 -8%
Vulcan Materials Company VMC $272.67 $117.03 -57%
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc MLM $575.83 $135.46 -76%
UltraTech Cement Limited ULTRACEMCO ₹10,912 ₹4,589 -58%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Basic Materials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1847 (1847) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.3200 versus a price of HK$0.4800 — about −33% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1847?
Our model-based fair value for 1847 is HK$0.3200 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.4800.
What is the quality score of 1847?
1847 has a Quality Score of 51/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1847 (1847)?
1847 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.2B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1847?
The net profit margin of 1847 is about -13.3%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.