1977 (1977) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$1.3B

1 1977 1977 · HK

PriceHK$0.9300

Fair ValueHK$2.51

Upside+169.9%

Quality69/100

Watch 1977 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$1.88 – HK$3.13

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 25 valuation models · updated today

Share price −7.0% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.6973 – HK$1.07 · fair‑value band HK$1.88 – HK$3.13 · the HK$0.9300 price screens below the HK$2.51 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1977 (1977) currently trades at HK$0.9300, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$2.51 — implying the stock looks roughly 169.9% undervalued today. We read business quality at 69/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1977 generated revenue of HK$6.1B at a net margin of 2.7%. Revenue grew 0.9% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 7.2%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$755M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$6.1B

Revenue growth (YoY) +0.9%

Net margin 2.7%

Return on equity 7.2%

Free cash flow HK$388M FY2025

P/E ratio 7.8

More key figures

Operating margin 4.3%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0600

Dividend yield 5.9%

EPS growth (YoY) +57.4%

Net cash HK$755M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1977 reported revenue of HK$6.1B in FY2025 versus HK$5.4B in FY2021, a compound +3.3%/yr. Reported net income was HK$167M in FY2025, compounding −14.6%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +3.3%/yr

FY21 HK$5.4B

FY22 HK$6.5B

FY23 HK$6.1B

FY24 HK$6.5B

FY25 HK$6.1B

Net income −14.6%/yr

FY21 HK$314M

FY22 HK$115M

FY23 HK$252M

FY24 HK$135M

FY25 HK$167M

Is 1977 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$42.70	$34.33	-20%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	460,500 KRW	206,212 KRW	-55%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.72	¥16.90	+258%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	4,541 MXN	-40%
000720 000720	127,800 KRW	55,602 KRW	-56%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,260 TWD	1,431 TWD	+14%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1977 (1977) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$2.51 versus a price of HK$0.9300 — about +170% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1977?

Our model-based fair value for 1977 is HK$2.51 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.9300.

What is the quality score of 1977?

1977 has a Quality Score of 69/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1977 (1977)?

1977 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$6.1B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1977?

The net profit margin of 1977 is about 2.7%, meaning it keeps roughly 2.7% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1977 pay a dividend?

1977 currently shows a dividend yield of about 5.91% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.