2195 (2195) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$50.7M

2 2195 2195 · HK

PriceHK$0.3000

Fair ValueHK$0.2400

Upside-20.0%

Quality38/100

Watch 2195 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Low Range HK$0.1800 – HK$0.3100

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 7 valuation models · updated today

Share price −16.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.2700 – HK$0.6300 · fair‑value band HK$0.1800 – HK$0.3100 · the HK$0.3000 price screens above the HK$0.2400 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2195 (2195) currently trades at HK$0.3000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.2400 — implying the stock looks roughly 20.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 38/100 (below-average quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2195 generated revenue of HK$210M at a net margin of -26.2%. Revenue grew 7.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -52.0%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$6.3M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$210M

Revenue growth (YoY) +7.4%

Net margin -26.2%

Return on equity -52.0%

Free cash flow HK$2.7M FY2025

Operating margin -21.7%

More key figures

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.1200

EPS growth (YoY) -44.0%

Net cash HK$6.3M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2195 reported revenue of HK$210M in FY2025 versus HK$250M in FY2021, a compound −4.3%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$54.9M in FY2025.

Revenue −4.3%/yr

FY21 HK$250M

FY22 HK$106M

FY23 HK$110M

FY24 HK$152M

FY25 HK$210M

Net income

FY21 HK$26.3M

FY22 −HK$7.4M

FY23 −HK$29.4M

FY24 −HK$27.0M

FY25 −HK$54.9M

Is 2195 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$0.4110	$0.0100	-98%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	407,500 KRW	236,704 KRW	-42%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.74	¥15.02	+217%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	3,472 MXN	-54%
000720 000720	130,300 KRW	55,602 KRW	-57%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,205 TWD	1,891 TWD	+57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2195 (2195) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.2400 versus a price of HK$0.3000 — about −20% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2195?

Our model-based fair value for 2195 is HK$0.2400 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.3000.

What is the quality score of 2195?

2195 has a Quality Score of 38/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2195 (2195)?

2195 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$210M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2195?

The net profit margin of 2195 is about -26.2%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.