2295 (2295) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$760M

2 2295 2295 · HK

PriceHK$1.90

Fair ValueHK$0.6600

Upside-65.3%

Quality61/100

Watch 2295 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.5000 – HK$0.8300

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 26 valuation models · updated today

Share price +2.7% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$1.83 – HK$6.90 · fair‑value band HK$0.5000 – HK$0.8300 · the HK$1.90 price screens above the HK$0.6600 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2295 (2295) currently trades at HK$1.90, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.6600 — implying the stock looks roughly 65.3% overvalued today. We read business quality at 61/100 (solid quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2295 generated revenue of HK$239M at a net margin of 5.3%. Revenue declined 11.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 14.3%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$83.1M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$239M

Revenue growth (YoY) -11.4%

Net margin 5.3%

Return on equity 14.3%

Free cash flow HK$17.7M FY2025

P/E ratio 63.3

More key figures

Operating margin 9.6%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0100

EPS growth (YoY) +26.1%

Net cash HK$83.1M FY2020

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2295 reported revenue of HK$239M in FY2025 versus HK$294M in FY2021, a compound −5.1%/yr. Reported net income was HK$12.6M in FY2025, compounding −17.9%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −5.1%/yr

FY21 HK$294M

FY22 HK$192M

FY23 HK$168M

FY24 HK$206M

FY25 HK$239M

Net income −17.9%/yr

FY21 HK$27.8M

FY22 HK$14.5M

FY23 HK$13.9M

FY24 HK$8.7M

FY25 HK$12.6M

Is 2295 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Engineering & Construction stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Larsen & Toubro Limited LTOD	$0.4415	$0.5700	+29%
Samsung C&T Corporation 028260	520,000 KRW	268,469 KRW	-48%
China State Construction Engineering Corporation 601668	¥4.65	¥17.35	+273%
TopBuild Corp BLD	7,547 MXN	324.01 MXN	-96%
Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co 000720	130,300 KRW	55,602 KRW	-57%
United Integrated Services Co 2404	1,205 TWD	1,891 TWD	+57%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2295 (2295) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.6600 versus a price of HK$1.90 — about −65% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2295?

Our model-based fair value for 2295 is HK$0.6600 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.90.

What is the quality score of 2295?

2295 has a Quality Score of 61/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2295 (2295)?

2295 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$239M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2295?

The net profit margin of 2295 is about 5.3%, meaning it keeps roughly 5.3% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.