Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Eugene Special Purpose Acquisitions 4 Company (321260) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · KR · Market cap 80.7B KRW

Price2,020 KRW
Fair Value1,322 KRW
Upside-34.6%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range 1,025 KRW – 1,764 KRW

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Eugene Special Purpose Acquisitions 4 Company (321260) currently trades at 2,020 KRW, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 1,322 KRW — implying the stock looks roughly 34.6% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

Eugene Special Purpose Acquisitions 4 Company does not have significant operations. It focuses on merging with other companies. The company was founded in 2019 and is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

ISC Co (095340) -59% Eugene Technology Co (084370) -76% Jeju Semiconductor Corp (080220) -79% Tokai Carbon Korea Co (064760) -54% HANA Micron Inc (067310) -36% PSK HOLDINGS Inc (031980) -45%

Frequently asked questions

Is Eugene Special Purpose Acquisitions 4 Company (321260) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 1,322 KRW versus a price of 2,020 KRW — about −35% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 321260?
Our 21-model fair value for Eugene Special Purpose Acquisitions 4 Company is 1,322 KRW (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 2,020 KRW.
What is the quality score of 321260?
Eugene Special Purpose Acquisitions 4 Company has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.