Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Castile Resources Limited (CLRSF) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · US · Market cap $29.7M

Price$0.0774
Fair Value$0.0252
Upside-67.4%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range $0.0252 – $0.0252

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Castile Resources Limited (CLRSF) currently trades at $0.0774, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.0252 — implying the stock looks roughly 67.4% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Castile Resources Limited engages in the mineral exploration and project development activities in Australia. It focuses on exploring for copper, gold, lead, cobalt, silver, zinc, bismuth, and other base metals. The company's flagship project owned 100% interests in the Rover projects located in the Northern Territory. Castile Resources Limited was incorporated in 2007 and is based in West Leederville, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

BHP Group (BHP) -43% Rio Tinto Group (RTNTF) -41% Grupo México, S.A. (GMBXF) -19% CMOC Group (CMCLY) -24% Vale S.A (VALEN) -52% Anglo American plc (AAUKF) -73%

Frequently asked questions

Is Castile Resources Limited (CLRSF) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.0252 versus a price of $0.0774 — about −67% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CLRSF?
Our 21-model fair value for Castile Resources Limited is $0.0252 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.0774.
What is the quality score of CLRSF?
Castile Resources Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.