Science Group (SAG) Fair Value & Analysis
Industrials · GB · Market cap 238M GBX
Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026
Analysis
Science Group (SAG) currently trades at p5.85, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is p8.58 — implying the stock looks roughly 46.7% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.
About the company
Science Group plc, a services and systems company, operates in the science, technology, and engineering applications in the United Kingdom, rest of European Countries, North America, Asia, and internationally. The company offers advisory, product development, and regulatory services. It is also involved in the design, development, and manufacture of submarine atmosphere management systems; and design and supply of radio and audio semi-conductors/modules. In addition, the company provides property, production, and consultancy services. It serves industrial, defense and aerospace, medical, and consumer sectors. The company was formerly known as Sagentia Group plc and changed its name to Science Group plc in July 2015. Science Group plc was incorporated in 2008 and is headquartered in Cambridge, the United Kingdom.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Science Group (SAG) undervalued?
What is the fair value of SAG?
What is the quality score of SAG?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.