Browse all 653 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 187
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Dimensional International Core Equity Market (DFAI)
Look-through valuation · Global · Expense ratio 0.17 % · ISIN US25434V2034
Price history (since 2020)
Monthly close since 2020. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding N.V. New York Registry Shares ASML | 1.9 % | n/a | n/a |
| Shell plc SHEL | 1.3 % | −16.2 % | 63 |
| Roche Holding AG ROP | 1.1 % | n/a | n/a |
| HSBC Holdings PLC HSBA | 1.0 % | −15.5 % | 57 |
| Nestle S.A. NESN | 0.9 % | −28.9 % | 68 |
| Royal Bank of Canada RY | 0.9 % | n/a | n/a |
| AstraZeneca PLC AZN | 0.7 % | −25.9 % | 69 |
| Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc 8306 | 0.7 % | n/a | n/a |
| Toyota Motor Corp 7203 | 0.7 % | n/a | n/a |
| TotalEnergies SE ADR TTE | 0.7 % | n/a | n/a |
| Novartis AG ADR NVS | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| BHP Group Ltd BHP | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| Allianz SE VNA O.N. ALV | 0.6 % | −46.8 % | 59 |
| Advantest Corp. 6857 | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| Sony Corp 6758 | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| SAP SE SAP | 0.6 % | −18.2 % | 82 |
| Recruit Holdings Co Ltd 6098 | 0.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| BP PLC BP | 0.5 % | −4.6 % | 57 |
| Tokyo Electron Limited 8035 | 0.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| Siemens Aktiengesellschaft SIE | 0.5 % | −42.8 % | 60 |
| Toronto Dominion Bank 8640 | 0.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| Hitachi Ltd 6501 | 0.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| Rolls-Royce Holdings PLC RR | 0.5 % | −27.0 % | 76 |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia CBA | 0.5 % | −56.1 % | 49 |
| Banco Santander S.A. SAN | 0.5 % | −28.8 % | 63 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 3366 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF 50.0 % below FV
- 2 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF 49.1 % below FV
- 3 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF 44.8 % below FV
- 4 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF 36.2 % below FV
- 5 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF 35.7 % below FV
- 6 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF 28.9 % below FV
- 7 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF 26.1 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF 23.0 % below FV
- 9 FDEM Fidelity® Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF 17.1 % below FV
- 10 TAN Invesco Solar ETF 16.6 % below FV
Frequently asked about DFAI
Is DFAI overvalued?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of DFAI?
What is the expense ratio of DFAI?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Dimensional International Core Equity Market ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Oct 27, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.