Browse all 653 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 187
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Franklin FTSE Australia (FLAU)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Country · Expense ratio 0.09 % · ISIN US35473P8436
Price history (since 2017)
Monthly close since 2017. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHP Group Ltd BHP | 13.1 % | n/a | n/a |
| Commonwealth Bank of Australia CBA | 10.5 % | −56.3 % | 49 |
| Westpac Banking Corporation WBC | 5.2 % | −29.5 % | 61 |
| ANZ Group Holdings Ltd ANZ | 5.0 % | −30.3 % | 65 |
| National Australia Bank Ltd NAB | 5.0 % | −33.6 % | 55 |
| CSL Ltd CSL | 3.8 % | −9.2 % | 61 |
| Macquarie Group Ltd MQG | 3.7 % | −67.4 % | 55 |
| Wesfarmers Ltd WES | 3.6 % | −35.2 % | 62 |
| Woodside Petroleum Ltd WPL | 2.5 % | n/a | n/a |
| Rio Tinto Ltd RIO | 2.4 % | n/a | n/a |
| Woolworths Group Ltd WOW | 2.1 % | −53.1 % | 62 |
| Goodman Group GMG | 2.1 % | −34.4 % | 66 |
| Transurban Group TCL | 1.7 % | −65.3 % | 57 |
| QBE Insurance Group Limited QBE | 1.6 % | −49.4 % | 69 |
| Aristocrat Leisure Ltd ALL | 1.4 % | +10.0 % | 81 |
| Northern Star Resources Ltd NST | 1.3 % | −30.2 % | 44 |
| Coles Group Ltd COL | 1.3 % | −30.6 % | 59 |
| Santos Ltd STO | 1.2 % | −53.5 % | 49 |
| Brambles Ltd BXB | 1.2 % | −13.8 % | 68 |
| Evolution Mining Ltd EVN | 1.1 % | −44.2 % | 68 |
| Fortescue Ltd FMG | 1.0 % | +200.0 % | 67 |
| Computershare Ltd CPU | 0.9 % | −2.7 % | 82 |
| Suncorp Group Ltd SUN | 0.9 % | −51.4 % | 56 |
| James Hardie Industries Plc JHX | 0.9 % | −71.6 % | 29 |
| Insurance Australia Group Ltd IAG | 0.9 % | −58.3 % | 47 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 100 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF 49.7 % below FV
- 2 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF 49.3 % below FV
- 3 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF 45.9 % below FV
- 4 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF 36.3 % below FV
- 5 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF 35.9 % below FV
- 6 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF 28.4 % below FV
- 7 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF 26.1 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF 23.0 % below FV
- 9 FDEM Fidelity® Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF 17.0 % below FV
- 10 XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR® Fund 16.2 % below FV
Frequently asked about FLAU
Is FLAU overvalued?
What is the fair value of FLAU?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of FLAU?
What is the expense ratio of FLAU?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Franklin FTSE Australia ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Oct 26, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.