Browse all 651 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 185
US market 62
Country 92
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 112
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Franklin Focused Growth (FFOG)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Style & factor · Expense ratio 0.55 % · ISIN US35473P4211
Price history (since 2023)
Monthly close since 2023. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation NVDA | 10.2 % | −55.7 % | 74 |
| Amazon.com Inc AMZN | 9.1 % | −49.4 % | 54 |
| Alphabet Inc Class A GOOGL | 8.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| Apple Inc. AAPL | 5.5 % | −45.4 % | 82 |
| Meta Platforms Inc. META | 4.4 % | −18.2 % | 68 |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing TSM | 4.2 % | −32.0 % | 78 |
| Sandisk Corp SNDK | 4.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| Microsoft Corporation MSFT | 3.9 % | −22.5 % | 66 |
| Broadcom Inc AVGO | 3.8 % | −67.5 % | 70 |
| SK Hynix Inc 000660 | 3.1 % | −20.1 % | 68 |
| Mastercard Inc MA | 2.8 % | −60.9 % | 83 |
| Lam Research Corp LRCX | 2.4 % | −70.9 % | 86 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc AMD | 2.3 % | −89.4 % | 75 |
| Celestica Inc. CLS | 2.3 % | n/a | n/a |
| ASML Holding NV ADR ASML | 2.3 % | n/a | n/a |
| Bloom Energy Corp BE | 2.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| KLA Corporation KLAC | 2.1 % | −59.2 % | 82 |
| Eli Lilly and Company LLY | 2.1 % | −65.4 % | 69 |
| Cloudflare Inc NET | 2.0 % | −98.6 % | 33 |
| Natera Inc NTRA | 1.7 % | −95.2 % | 37 |
| Lumentum Holdings Inc LITE | 1.6 % | n/a | n/a |
| Arista Networks ANET | 1.4 % | −70.1 % | 74 |
| GE Vernova LLC GEV | 1.4 % | −86.1 % | 65 |
| Tesla Inc TSLA | 1.4 % | −94.0 % | 37 |
| Quanta Services Inc PWR | 1.4 % | −77.0 % | 50 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 40 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF +66.3 % below FV
- 2 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF +63.9 % below FV
- 3 FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF +58.8 % below FV
- 4 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF +38.6 % below FV
- 5 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF +33.7 % below FV
- 6 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF +30.6 % below FV
- 7 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF +21.3 % below FV
- 8 TAN Invesco Solar ETF +17.1 % below FV
- 9 BRAZ Global X Brazil Active ETF +16.0 % below FV
- 10 C003 Amundi Index Solutions - Amundi DivDAX I UCITS ETF EUR Distributing +9.3 % below FV
Frequently asked about FFOG
Is FFOG overvalued?
What is the fair value of FFOG?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of FFOG?
What is the expense ratio of FFOG?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Franklin Focused Growth ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Sep 11, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.