Browse all 653 ETFs by category, no search needed
Global 187
US market 62
Country 93
Core UCITS 15
Sector 103
Style & factor 111
Theme 45
Dividend 37
Franklin Focused Growth (FFOG)Overvalued or undervalued?
Look-through valuation · Style & factor · Expense ratio 0.53 % · ISIN US35473P4211
Price history (since 2023)
Monthly close since 2023. Price shows performance, the valuation verdict is in the look-through above.
Top holdings
| Holding | Weight | vs fair value | Quality |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation NVDA | 10.0 % | −5.9 % | 73 |
| Amazon.com Inc AMZN | 9.8 % | −43.4 % | 56 |
| Alphabet Inc Class A GOOGL | 9.4 % | n/a | n/a |
| Apple Inc. AAPL | 6.2 % | −0.3 % | 82 |
| Meta Platforms Inc. META | 5.1 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing TSM | 4.2 % | +10.0 % | 77 |
| Microsoft Corporation MSFT | 4.2 % | +10.0 % | 66 |
| Broadcom Inc AVGO | 3.6 % | −6.5 % | 71 |
| Sandisk Corp SNDK | 3.3 % | +80.9 % | 82 |
| Mastercard Inc MA | 3.0 % | −42.6 % | 83 |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc AMD | 2.6 % | −71.2 % | 75 |
| Eli Lilly and Company LLY | 2.3 % | −41.2 % | 67 |
| Cloudflare Inc NET | 2.2 % | −95.1 % | 34 |
| ASML Holding N.V. New York Registry Shares ASML | 2.2 % | n/a | n/a |
| SK Hynix Inc 000660 | 2.1 % | +13.8 % | 72 |
| Natera Inc NTRA | 2.1 % | −94.5 % | 40 |
| Celestica Inc. CLS | 2.1 % | n/a | n/a |
| Lam Research Corp LRCX | 2.0 % | +9.0 % | 86 |
| KLA Corporation KLAC | 1.8 % | −8.0 % | 59 |
| Bloom Energy Corp BE | 1.8 % | n/a | n/a |
| Tesla Inc TSLA | 1.5 % | −89.2 % | 49 |
| Snowflake Inc. SNOW | 1.5 % | −77.3 % | 64 |
| Arista Networks ANET | 1.4 % | −6.4 % | 74 |
| Shopify Inc SHOP | 1.4 % | −59.3 % | 68 |
| GE Vernova LLC GEV | 1.4 % | −82.5 % | 67 |
Fair value and quality per position come from the same valuation as our stock pages. Showing the 25 largest of 39 disclosed positions. "n/a" means the position is not (yet) in our stock universe and does not enter the average.
The 10 most cheaply valued ETFs
Measured against the look-through fair value of the holdings (sufficiently covered funds only). Green means below fair value, red above. Not financial advice.
- 1 KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF 49.7 % below FV
- 2 CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF 49.3 % below FV
- 3 CHIU Global X MSCI China Utilities ETF 45.9 % below FV
- 4 MCHI iShares MSCI China ETF 36.3 % below FV
- 5 FLCH Franklin FTSE China ETF 35.9 % below FV
- 6 FDNI First Trust Dow Jones International Internet ETF 28.4 % below FV
- 7 FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF 26.1 % below FV
- 8 ITB iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF 23.0 % below FV
- 9 FDEM Fidelity® Emerging Markets Multifactor ETF 17.0 % below FV
- 10 XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR® Fund 16.2 % below FV
Frequently asked about FFOG
Is FFOG overvalued?
What is the fair value of FFOG?
How do you calculate the fair value of an ETF?
Which stocks drive the valuation of FFOG?
What is the expense ratio of FFOG?
How we value this ETF
An ETF has no fair value of its own like a single stock. We build it bottom up: every holding has a fair value and a quality score on our pages. Weighted by portfolio share, that gives Franklin Focused Growth ETF an average of how cheap or expensive its companies currently sit versus fair value, and how high their average quality is.
As of: Oct 26, 2026
The look-through is a computed summary of public fundamentals and is no substitute for your own research.