0914 (0914) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · Market cap HK$89.4B

0 0914 0914 · HK

PriceHK$16.77

Fair ValueHK$30.35

Upside+81.0%

Quality54/100

Evidence: Medium Range HK$22.76 – HK$37.94

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price −8.6% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$16.77 – HK$25.73 · fair‑value band HK$22.76 – HK$37.94 · the HK$16.77 price screens below the HK$30.35 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

0914 (0914) currently trades at HK$16.77, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$30.35 — implying the stock looks roughly 81.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 54/100 (solid quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 0914 generated revenue of HK$80.5B at a net margin of 9.7%. Revenue declined 10.5% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 3.7%. Net debt stands at HK$16.3B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$80.5B

Revenue growth (YoY) -10.5%

Net margin 9.7%

Return on equity 3.7%

Free cash flow HK$7.0B FY2025

P/E ratio 9.9

More key figures

Operating margin 9.4%

EPS (TTM) HK$1.60

Dividend yield 5.1%

EPS growth (YoY) -17.6%

Net debt HK$16.3B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

0914 reported revenue of HK$80.4B in FY2025 versus HK$168B in FY2021, a compound −16.8%/yr. Reported net income was HK$8.2B in FY2025, compounding −29.4%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −16.8%/yr

FY21 HK$168B

FY22 HK$132B

FY23 HK$141B

FY24 HK$91.0B

FY25 HK$80.4B

Net income −29.4%/yr

FY21 HK$33.3B

FY22 HK$15.7B

FY23 HK$10.4B

FY24 HK$7.7B

FY25 HK$8.2B

Is 0914 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Building Materials stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
CRH plc CRH	$99.98	$57.88	-42%
Holcim AG HCMLY	$19.20	$8.68	-55%
Heidelberg Materials AG HEI	€190.80	€134.98	-29%
Vulcan Materials Company VMC	$272.67	$117.03	-57%
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc MLM	$575.83	$135.46	-76%
UltraTech Cement Limited ULTRACEMCO	₹10,866	₹4,589	-58%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Basic Materials stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 0914 (0914) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$30.35 versus a price of HK$16.77 — about +81% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 0914?

Our model-based fair value for 0914 is HK$30.35 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$16.77.

What is the quality score of 0914?

0914 has a Quality Score of 54/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 0914 (0914)?

0914 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$80.5B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 0914?

The net profit margin of 0914 is about 9.7%, meaning it keeps roughly 9.7% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 0914 pay a dividend?

0914 currently shows a dividend yield of about 5.07% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.