Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1937 (1937) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · Market cap HK$130M

1 1937 1937 · HK
PriceHK$0.1300
Fair ValueHK$0.1200
Upside-7.7%
Quality44/100
Watch 1937 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: High Range HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1200

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 22 valuation models · updated today

Share price −32.3% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.3300 HK$0.1300 Fair Value HK$0.1200 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1300 – HK$0.3300 · fair‑value band HK$0.1100 – HK$0.1200 · the HK$0.1300 price screens above the HK$0.1200 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1937 (1937) currently trades at HK$0.1300, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1200 — implying the stock looks roughly 7.7% overvalued today. We read business quality at 44/100 (below-average quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1937 generated revenue of HK$190M at a net margin of 2.0%. Revenue declined 27.3% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 1.2%. Net debt stands at HK$6.1M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$190M
Revenue growth (YoY) -27.3%
Net margin 2.0%
Return on equity 1.2%
Free cash flow HK$31.2M FY2025
Operating margin 4.8%
More key figures
EPS growth (YoY) +66.5%
Net debt HK$6.1M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1937 reported revenue of HK$190M in FY2025 versus HK$275M in FY2021, a compound −8.9%/yr. Reported net income was HK$3.8M in FY2025, compounding −37.3%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −8.9%/yr
FY21 HK$275M
FY22 HK$227M
FY23 HK$235M
FY24 HK$258M
FY25 HK$190M
Net income −37.3%/yr
FY21 HK$24.5M
FY22 HK$10.7M
FY23 HK$5.9M
FY24 HK$11.9M
FY25 HK$3.8M

Is 1937 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Building Products & Equipment stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Trane Technologies plc TT $491.59 $210.11 -57%
Johnson Controls International plc JCI $148.21 $39.05 -74%
Carrier Global Corporation CARR $67.97 $16.28 -76%
Compagnie de Saint-Gobain S.A CODGF $89.95 $106.78 +19%
Daikin Industries,Ltd. DKILF $138.86 $132.61 -5%
Geberit AG GBERF $661.46 $368.56 -44%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Industrials stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1937 (1937) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1200 versus a price of HK$0.1300 — about −8% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1937?
Our model-based fair value for 1937 is HK$0.1200 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1300.
What is the quality score of 1937?
1937 has a Quality Score of 44/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1937 (1937)?
1937 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$190M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1937?
The net profit margin of 1937 is about 2.0%, meaning it keeps roughly 2.0% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.