2007 (2007) Fair Value & Analysis

Real Estate · Market cap HK$8.3B

2 2007 2007 · HK

PriceHK$0.1730

Fair ValueHK$0.1672

Upside-3.4%

Quality28/100

Watch 2007 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.1170 – HK$0.2170

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 15 valuation models · updated today

Share price −23.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.1670 – HK$0.6900 · fair‑value band HK$0.1170 – HK$0.2170 · the HK$0.1730 price screens above the HK$0.1672 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2007 (2007) currently trades at HK$0.1730, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.1672 — implying the stock looks roughly 3.4% overvalued today. We read business quality at 28/100 (below-average quality), in the Real Estate sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: medium).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2007 generated revenue of HK$155B at a net margin of 2.1%. Revenue declined 45.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 3.4%. Net debt stands at HK$145B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$155B

Revenue growth (YoY) -45.4%

Net margin 2.1%

Return on equity 3.4%

Free cash flow HK$1.5B FY2025

P/E ratio 1.3

More key figures

Operating margin -52.7%

EPS (TTM) HK$-0.6900

EPS growth (YoY) -96.1%

Net debt HK$145B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2007 reported revenue of HK$155B in FY2025 versus HK$523B in FY2021, a compound −26.2%/yr. Reported net income was HK$3.3B in FY2025, compounding −40.9%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −26.2%/yr

FY21 HK$523B

FY22 HK$430B

FY23 HK$401B

FY24 HK$253B

FY25 HK$155B

Net income −40.9%/yr

FY21 HK$26.8B

FY22 −HK$6.1B

FY23 −HK$178B

FY24 −HK$32.8B

FY25 HK$3.3B

Is 2007 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Real Estate - Development stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Vinhomes Joint Stock Company VHM	155,400 VND	148,549 VND	-4%
DLF Limited DLF	₹621.35	₹159.49	-74%
PT Pantai Indah Kapuk Dua Tbk, PANI	6,150 IDR	1,330 IDR	-78%
Lodha Developers Limited LODHA	₹926.65	₹774.29	-16%
Oberoi Realty Limited OBEROIRLTY	₹1,592	₹1,400	-12%
Godrej Properties Limited GODREJPROP	₹1,799	₹1,034	-43%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Real Estate stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2007 (2007) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.1672 versus a price of HK$0.1730 — about −3% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2007?

Our model-based fair value for 2007 is HK$0.1672 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1730.

What is the quality score of 2007?

2007 has a Quality Score of 28/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2007 (2007)?

2007 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$155B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2007?

The net profit margin of 2007 is about 2.1%, meaning it keeps roughly 2.1% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.