Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

2350 (2350) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$530M

2 2350 2350 · HK
PriceHK$0.6200
Fair ValueHK$0.2300
Upside-62.9%
Quality50/100
Watch 2350 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.1700 – HK$0.2800

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 7 valuation models · updated today

Share price −41.5% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$1.18 HK$0.3550 Fair Value HK$0.2300 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.3550 – HK$1.18 · fair‑value band HK$0.1700 – HK$0.2800 · the HK$0.6200 price screens above the HK$0.2300 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2350 (2350) currently trades at HK$0.6200, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.2300 — implying the stock looks roughly 62.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 50/100 (solid quality), in the Technology sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2350 generated revenue of HK$709M at a net margin of -6.3%. Revenue declined 4.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -27.6%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$30.8M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$709M
Revenue growth (YoY) -4.0%
Net margin -6.3%
Return on equity -27.6%
Free cash flow HK$11.2M FY2025
Operating margin -10.5%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0100
EPS growth (YoY) -96.5%
Net cash HK$30.8M FY2026

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2022 – FY2026 · reported fiscal years

2350 reported revenue of HK$709M in FY2026 versus HK$632M in FY2022, a compound +2.9%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$44.5M in FY2026.

Revenue +2.9%/yr
FY22 HK$632M
FY23 HK$753M
FY24 HK$628M
FY25 HK$630M
FY26 HK$709M
Net income
FY22 HK$47.3M
FY23 HK$43.7M
FY24 −HK$15.0M
FY25 −HK$10.3M
FY26 −HK$44.5M

Is 2350 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Information Technology Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
International Business Machines Corporation IBM $252.22 $147.06 -42%
Accenture plc ACN $170.50 $228.49 +34%
Tata Consultancy Services Limited TCS ₹2,199 ₹1,863 -15%
Infosys Limited INFY ₹1,198 ₹1,237 +3%
HCL Technologies Limited HCLTECH ₹1,132 ₹1,230 +9%
Fiserv, Inc FISV 930.00 MXN 1,179 MXN +27%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2350 (2350) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.2300 versus a price of HK$0.6200 — about −63% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 2350?
Our model-based fair value for 2350 is HK$0.2300 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.6200.
What is the quality score of 2350?
2350 has a Quality Score of 50/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 2350 (2350)?
2350 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$709M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 2350?
The net profit margin of 2350 is about -6.3%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.