Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Zhengyuan Geomatics Group (688509) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · CN · Market cap 3.8B CNY

Price¥4.75
Fair Value¥6.63
Upside+39.6%
Quality91/100
Evidence: Low Range ¥4.98 – ¥8.29

Analysis

Zhengyuan Geomatics Group (688509) currently trades at ¥4.75, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is ¥6.63 — implying the stock looks roughly 39.6% undervalued today. We read business quality at 91/100 (high quality), in the Industrials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Zhengyuan Geomatics Group Co.,Ltd. engages in the research, development, and application of surveying and mapping geographical information technology services in China. The company operates in three segments: Surveying and Mapping Geographic Information, Underground Pipe Network, and Smart City. It offers smart city construction and operation business company; technical services for underground pipeline network safety operation and maintenance; and surveying and mapping geographic information technology service. The company serves urban construction, planning, land, railway, transportation, water conservancy, environmental protection, agriculture, forestry, marine, and other industries. Zhengyuan Geomatics Group Co.,Ltd. was founded in 1952 and is based in Beijing, China.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.