Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Redwood Group (8426) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · TW · Market cap 1.1B TWD

Price20.35 TWD
Fair Value40.72 TWD
Upside+100.1%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range 30.54 TWD – 50.90 TWD

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

Analysis

Redwood Group (8426) currently trades at 20.35 TWD, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 40.72 TWD — implying the stock looks roughly 100.1% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Redwood Group Ltd, together with its subsidiaries, engages in the decoration of boutique brand stores in Malaysia, Thailand, India, Vietnam, Japan, the United States, China, the Philippines, Australia, and France. The company also operates as a contract manufacturer of interior fittings for luxury brands. In addition, it provides carpentry, glass, metal and PVD, LED and electrical, paints and coatings, sofas and interior decoration, tree bark, acrylic, solid surface and stone processing, and packing services. The company was founded in 2000 and is based in Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Redwood Group (8426) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 40.72 TWD versus a price of 20.35 TWD — about +100% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 8426?
Our 21-model fair value for Redwood Group is 40.72 TWD (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 20.35 TWD.
What is the quality score of 8426?
Redwood Group has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.