Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Antiaging Quantum Living Inc (AAQL) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · US · Market cap $22.9M

Price$0.7000
Fair Value$0.0800
Upside-88.6%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range $0.0600 – $0.1000

Fair value as of: Jun 23, 2026

Analysis

Antiaging Quantum Living Inc (AAQL) currently trades at $0.7000, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.0800 — implying the stock looks roughly 88.6% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Antiaging Quantum Living Inc. focuses on website development, maintenance, and online business advertisement. The company was incorporated in 2014 and is based in Flushing, New York.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Antiaging Quantum Living Inc (AAQL) undervalued?
As of Jun 23, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.0800 versus a price of $0.7000 — about −89% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of AAQL?
Our 21-model fair value for Antiaging Quantum Living Inc is $0.0800 (as of Jun 23, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.7000.
What is the quality score of AAQL?
Antiaging Quantum Living Inc has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.