Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Canoe Mining Ventures Corp (CLV) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · CA · Market cap A$160M

PriceA$0.8900
Fair ValueA$0.7100
Upside-20.2%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range A$0.4400 – A$0.8900

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

Analysis

Canoe Mining Ventures Corp (CLV) currently trades at A$0.8900, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.7100 — implying the stock looks roughly 20.2% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

About the company

Canoe Mining Ventures Corp. engages in the acquisition, exploration, evaluation, and development of principally gold resource properties in Canada. It holds a 100% interest in the Kerrs gold property, which comprises 12 mining leasehold patents located in the Larder Lake Mining Division of Ontario; and the Butt Property consisting of 87 mineral exploration claims located in Butt Township, District of Nipissing in the Province of Ontario. Canoe Mining Ventures Corp. is based in Toronto, Canada.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Canoe Mining Ventures Corp (CLV) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.7100 versus a price of A$0.8900 — about −20% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CLV?
Our 21-model fair value for Canoe Mining Ventures Corp is A$0.7100 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.8900.
What is the quality score of CLV?
Canoe Mining Ventures Corp has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.