Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

ESOTIQ & Henderson S.A (EAH) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Cyclical · PL · Market cap 54.7M PLN

Price31.00 PLN
Fair Value72.77 PLN
Upside+134.7%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range 50.94 PLN – 94.60 PLN

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

ESOTIQ & Henderson S.A (EAH) currently trades at 31.00 PLN, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 72.77 PLN — implying the stock looks roughly 134.7% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Cyclical sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

ESOTIQ & Henderson S.A. designs, manufactures, and sells lingerie, clothing, and cosmetics in Poland and internationally. It offers its products under the ESOTIQ and HENDERSON brands for women and men. The company sells its products through commercial network and franchisees. The company was founded in 1998 and is headquartered in Gdansk, Poland.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is ESOTIQ & Henderson S.A (EAH) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 72.77 PLN versus a price of 31.00 PLN — about +135% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of EAH?
Our 21-model fair value for ESOTIQ & Henderson S.A is 72.77 PLN (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 31.00 PLN.
What is the quality score of EAH?
ESOTIQ & Henderson S.A has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.