Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Leopard Energy, Inc (LEEN) Fair Value & Analysis

Energy · US · Market cap $175K

Price$0.1332
Fair Value$0.3500
Upside+162.8%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range $0.2600 – $0.4400

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Leopard Energy, Inc (LEEN) currently trades at $0.1332, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $0.3500 — implying the stock looks roughly 162.8% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Energy sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Leopard Energy, Inc. develops mobile applications that enable users to save money on products and services from member merchants and suppliers with mobile coupons. The company was formerly known as Cyber Apps World Inc. and changed its name to Leopard Energy, Inc. in April 2024. Leopard Energy, Inc. was incorporated in 2002 and is based in Lugano, Switzerland. Leopard Energy, Inc. is a subsidiary of Zenith Energy Ltd.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

CNOOC Limited (600938) -18% COP (COP) -26% COPH34 (COPH34) -24% YCP (YCP) -5% Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNQ) +65% EOG Resources, Inc (EOG) -24%

Frequently asked questions

Is Leopard Energy, Inc (LEEN) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of $0.3500 versus a price of $0.1332 — about +163% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of LEEN?
Our 21-model fair value for Leopard Energy, Inc is $0.3500 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is $0.1332.
What is the quality score of LEEN?
Leopard Energy, Inc has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.