Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Patagonia Lithium Limited (PL3) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$21.7M

PriceA$0.0910
Fair ValueA$0.0173
Upside-81.0%
Quality91/100
Evidence: Low

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Patagonia Lithium Limited (PL3) currently trades at A$0.0910, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.0173 — implying the stock looks roughly 81.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 91/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

Patagonia Lithium Limited engages in the exploration and development of mineral properties in Argentina and Brazil. It explores lithium, borates, niobium, spodumene, and rare earth metals. The company's flagship project is the Formentera project covering an area of approximately 1,752 hectares located in Paso Salar, Jujuy Province. Patagonia Lithium Limited was incorporated in 2021 and is based in Melbourne, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

BHP Group (BHP) -45% Rio Tinto Group (RTNTF) -41% Grupo México, S.A. (GMBXF) -19% CMOC Group (CMCLY) -24% Vale S.A (VALEN) -38% Anglo American plc (AAUKF) -61%

Frequently asked questions

Is Patagonia Lithium Limited (PL3) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.0173 versus a price of A$0.0910 — about −81% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of PL3?
Our 21-model fair value for Patagonia Lithium Limited is A$0.0173 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0910.
What is the quality score of PL3?
Patagonia Lithium Limited has a Quality Score of 91/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.