Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Regent Pacific Properties Inc (RPP) Fair Value & Analysis

Real Estate · CA · Market cap C$1.6M

PriceC$0.0400
Fair ValueC$0.0640
Upside+60.0%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Medium Range C$0.0560 – C$0.1200

Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026

Analysis

Regent Pacific Properties Inc (RPP) currently trades at C$0.0400, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is C$0.0640 — implying the stock looks roughly 60.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Real Estate sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Regent Pacific Properties Inc. operates as a real estate development and investment company in Canada. The company invests in and leases residential and commercial properties. Its portfolio consists of a three-story commercial office tower and attached single-story bays with an underground parking facility; and ten residential condominium units. Regent Pacific Properties Inc. is headquartered in Edmonton, Canada.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Regent Pacific Properties Inc (RPP) undervalued?
As of Jun 26, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of C$0.0640 versus a price of C$0.0400 — about +60% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of RPP?
Our 21-model fair value for Regent Pacific Properties Inc is C$0.0640 (as of Jun 26, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is C$0.0400.
What is the quality score of RPP?
Regent Pacific Properties Inc has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.