EN DE

Tiger Brands Limited (TBS) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · ZA · Market cap 41.1B ZAC

TB Tiger Brands Limited TBS · JSE
PriceR280.14
Fair ValueR325.38
Upside+16.1%
Quality72/100
Watch Tiger Brands Limited for free, get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Expensive Growth
Thin margins · 9.6% net margin
Low debt · generates free cash flow
0.06% dividend yield
Ranks above peers (9/15)
Moderate moat 62/100
Evidence: High Range R222.84 – R471.01 Share as image

Fair value as of: Jul 16, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated 26 days ago

Share price +0.7% over the past month.

A solid business, screening 16% undervalued on our models.

What matters now

  • A fairly wide model range (R222.84 to R471.01) leaves room in how you read the outcome.
  • Our model range runs from R222.84 (bear) to R471.01 (bull), base R325.38. The closer the price sits to the lower half, the larger the margin of safety.
  • Quality 72/100 (solid quality) with high evidence: the data supports the verdict.
Share this valuation: 𝕏 WhatsApp

Price vs Fair Value (5 years)

R377.96 R125.66 Fair Value R325.38 Apr 2021 Aug 2026

White line = price, green steps = our fair value per fiscal year, dashed = 300-day average. As of Jul 16, 2026.

How to read this chart

60‑month range R125.66 – R377.96 · fair‑value band R222.84 – R471.01 · the R280.14 price screens below the R325.38 fair value. Dashed = 300-day average. As of Jul 16, 2026.

Full chart & analysis →

Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

Tiger Brands Limited (TBS) currently trades at R280.14, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is R325.38, implying the stock looks roughly 16.1% undervalued today. The Quality Score stands at 72/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high), always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, Tiger Brands Limited generated revenue of 34.6B ZAR at a net margin of 9.6%. Revenue grew 1.3% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 21.3%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of 2.7B ZAR. Fundamentals as of Jul 16, 2026

Our scenario range runs from R222.84 (bear case) to R471.01 (bull case); at R280.14, the current price sits within that range. Bear and bull are the same models run on conservative and optimistic assumptions (margins, growth, valuation multiples), so a plausible valuation range, not a price target. For context, the median of 10 Consumer Defensive peers we cover trades at -3% fair-value upside, at 16%, TBS screens cheaper than that median.

Fair Value models

Each model estimates fair value its own way; the Fair Value above is the evidence-weighted blend. Evidence (0–100) measures how completely this model’s inputs are available: well-fed models carry more weight in the blend. The spread across models is intentional, each one stresses a different value driver; dividend models, for instance, come out structurally low when payout is small.

Model Bear Bear = the cautious scenario: the same model computed with conservative anchors (lower growth, margins and valuation multiples). Together with Bull it frames a plausible valuation range, not a price target.BaseBull Bull = the optimistic scenario: the same model computed with favourable anchors (higher growth, margins and valuation multiples). Together with Bear it frames a plausible valuation range, not a price target. Evidence
Highest evidence
Growth DCF R101.16 R130.69 R171.81 80
Residual Income R158.07 R189.80 R471.01 76
Rev-Margin DCF R189.85 R295.92 R407.66 74
All 24 models by family
DCF Models
FCF DCF R98.52 R129.59 R174.73 38
Owner Earnings R268.64 R367.87 R512.07 31
5Y Revenue Exit R189.85 R295.98 R429.83 39
5Y EBITDA Exit R221.22 R350.62 R497.56 41
5Y P/E Exit R275.27 R444.78 R615.82 38
10Y Revenue Exit R147.76 R235.81 R343.82 36
10Y EBITDA Exit R173.90 R272.34 R391.86 37
10Y P/E Exit R207.41 R335.30 R475.73 35
Earnings-Based
Graham-Dodd R177.55 R361.50 R455.46 54
EPV R146.08 R166.92 R185.16 59
Dividend Discount
Gordon GGM R222.84 R325.38 R432.27 70
DDM Multi-Stage R222.84 R315.31 R421.91 61
Multiples
P/E Multiple R411.23 R548.31 R685.38 63
P/S Multiple R282.31 R376.41 R470.51 58
P/B Multiple R332.90 R443.87 R554.83 55
EV/EBIT R355.20 R466.61 R578.01 53
EV/EBITDA R333.72 R437.96 R542.21 54
EV/Revenue R259.53 R361.76 R463.98 43
Asset-Based
NCAV (Graham) R58.09 R77.84 R116.18 50
Growth DCF
Growth DCF R101.16 R130.69 R171.81 80
Rev-Margin DCF R189.85 R295.92 R407.66 74
Economic Profit
Residual Income R158.07 R189.80 R471.01 76
ROIC Compounder R148.89 R176.29 R205.74 72
Growth Earnings
Growth-Adj P/E R299.39 R427.71 R556.02 68

Widest divergence: Multiples (R437.96) versus Asset-Based (R77.84). Highest evidence: Growth DCF (80).

Notify me when TBS reaches fair value

Free. You confirm by email (double opt-in) and can unsubscribe anytime in one click.

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) 34.6B ZAC
Revenue growth (YoY) +1.3%
Net margin 9.6%
Return on equity 21.3%
Free cash flow 1.1B ZAC FY2025
P/E ratio 13.6
More key figures
Operating margin 11.5%
EPS (TTM) R21.21
Dividend yield 0.1%
EPS growth (YoY) -19.4%
Net cash 2.7B ZAC FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals · as of Jul 16, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Quality Score breakdown

Overall quality 72/100

Of which business quality 68 · Market factors (momentum, volatility) 45

Profitability 77
Margins and returns on capital today
Quality Growth 51
Are margins and returns improving?
Cashflow 22
Earnings quality: real cash, not paper profit
Fin. Strength 87
Balance sheet, leverage, solvency risk
Investment 86
Disciplined investing over empire-building
Low Volatility 89
Calm price path (market factor)
Momentum 29
Price trend over the last 3–12 months (market factor)
52W Momentum 20
Distance to the 52-week high (market factor)
Net Issuance 97
Buybacks instead of dilution

Non-valuation factor families (profitability, growth, cashflow, financial strength, momentum …), each academically grounded. Valuation itself sits in the Fair Value and is deliberately excluded here to avoid double-counting.

About the company

Tiger Brands Limited engages in the manufacture and sale of fast-moving consumer goods in South Africa and internationally. It operates through Milling and Baking; Culinary; Snacks, Treats, and Beverages; and Home and Personal Care segments. The company offers wheat milling and baking; and culinary, Davita, and baby nutrition products.

Full company description

Tiger Brands Limited engages in the manufacture and sale of fast-moving consumer goods in South Africa and internationally. It operates through Milling and Baking; Culinary; Snacks, Treats, and Beverages; and Home and Personal Care segments. The company offers wheat milling and baking; and culinary, Davita, and baby nutrition products. It operates under the Albany, All Gold, Black Cat, Crosse & Blackwell, DOOM, Energade, Fatti's & Moni's, Ingrams, Jungle Oats, KOO, Maynards, Mrs H.S Balls, Oros, PURITY, Tastic, and Benny brands. The company also exports its products to approximately 22 countries. Tiger Brands Limited was founded in 1921 and is based in Midrand, South Africa.

Company description, as reported by the company or data provider.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

Tiger Brands Limited reported revenue of R34.4B in FY2025 versus R31.0B in FY2021, a compound +2.7%/yr. Reported net income was R3.8B in FY2025, compounding +19.2%/yr from FY2021.

Growth Quality 43/100
The company is growing, but growth may require heavy reinvestment or weak cash conversion.
Latest Revenue (FY 2025)
34.4B ZAR
Latest YoY
−8.7%
Avg. growth/yr (3Y) Measures the company's TOTAL revenue from reported annual statements: compound average growth per year (CAGR) from the fiscal year 3, 5 or N years back to the most recent comparable fiscal year. Not per share: buybacks do not change this number, and a merger can appear as a growth jump.
+0.4%
Avg. growth/yr (5Y) Measures the company's TOTAL revenue from reported annual statements: compound average growth per year (CAGR) from the fiscal year 3, 5 or N years back to the most recent comparable fiscal year. Not per share: buybacks do not change this number, and a merger can appear as a growth jump.
+2.9%
Avg. growth/yr (24Y) Measures the company's TOTAL revenue from reported annual statements: compound average growth per year (CAGR) from the fiscal year 3, 5 or N years back to the most recent comparable fiscal year. Not per share: buybacks do not change this number, and a merger can appear as a growth jump.
+3.0%
Revenue +2.7%/yr
FY21 R31.0B
FY22 R34.0B
FY23 R37.4B
FY24 R37.7B
FY25 R34.4B
Net income +19.2%/yr
FY21 R1.9B
FY22 R2.9B
FY23 R2.7B
FY24 R3.0B
FY25 R3.8B
Character of growth · EPS growth decomposed (2014-2025) +3.9 % p.a.
Revenue per share +2.3 pp

of which total revenue +1.8 pp · buybacks/dilution +0.5 pp

EBIT margin −3.1 pp
Tax rate +0.7 pp
Residual (interest, one-offs) +4.0 pp

Absolute contributions in percentage points per year; they sum to the EPS growth rate. Start and end points are 3-year averages (details on hover).

Watch TBS: get an alert when its fair value changes →

Share or link this analysis
For bloggers & editors: embed code + live data

For bloggers, editors and developers: paste this into your site or blog (a “Custom HTML” block in WordPress), it shows the current fair value and links back here. Free, plain HTML, and welcome. Full data streams (CSV/JSON) at /developers.

Cite: Fair Value Calculator (2026). "Tiger Brands Limited Fair Value". https://www.fairvalue-calculator.com/stock/TBS

Peer Group

Packaged Foods · 648 stocks

How this stock ranks against its industry: the green marker is this stock, the band is the typical 25–75% peer range, and the tick is the median.

Quality Score 72 · Top 25%
Fair Value upside +16% · Above median
Return on equity (TTM) 21% · Top 25%
Return on assets 10% · Top 25%
Net margin (TTM) 10% · Top 25%
Operating margin (TTM) 12% · Top 25%
Revenue growth 1% · Below median
Dividend yield (TTM) 0.1% · Bottom 25%

Valuation Multiples vs Packaged Foods median · lower = cheaper

P/E (TTM) 13.2× · Cheaper than median
P/B 2.42× · Pricier than median
P/S (TTM) 1.19× · Pricier than median
P/FCF 2.3× · Pricier than median
EV/EBITDA 7.6× · Cheaper than median
PEG 77.43× · Pricier than 75% of peers

Snowflake

Five quick dimensions, each 0 to 100: VALUE (fair-value potential), FUTURE (revenue growth), PAST (return on equity), HEALTH (low debt), DIVIDEND (yield). Green = this stock, grey = typical sector peer.

VALUE 55 · sector 28
FUTURE 7 · sector 20
PAST 85 · sector 27
HEALTH 100 · sector 96
DIVIDEND 1 · sector 47

Values & ESG

Does this company touch areas you may want to avoid? The classification is inferred from sector and industry.

None of the checked exposures detected

ESG scores are not available for this stock yet. Values and ESG data are contextual and can differ between providers.

Similar stocks

10 more Packaged Foods stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 16, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Nestlé India Limited NESTLEIND ₹1,427 ₹362.37 -75%
Britannia Industries Limited BRITANNIA ₹5,413 ₹1,870 -65%
Tata Consumer Products Limited TATACONSUM ₹1,089 ₹327.27 -70%
PT Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk ICBP 6,650 IDR 15,757 IDR +137%
Samyang Foods Co 003230 1,139,000 KRW 1,010,543 KRW -11%
Patanjali Foods Limited PATANJALI ₹413.80 ₹157.04 -62%
Vietnam Dairy Products Joint Stock Company VNM 58,500 VND 68,259 VND +17%
PT Mayora Indah Tbk, MYOR 1,750 IDR 2,699 IDR +54%
PT Cisarua Mountain Dairy Tbk CMRY 4,490 IDR 4,355 IDR -3%
Nongshim Co 004370 348,500 KRW 530,619 KRW +52%

Compare Tiger Brands Limited with another stock

Price, fair value, quality and upside side by side.

Free, no sign-up

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap StocksUndervalued Dividend Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is Tiger Brands Limited (TBS) overvalued or undervalued?
As of Jul 16, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of R325.38 versus a price of R280.14, about +16% (undervalued).
What is the fair value of TBS?
Our model-based fair value for Tiger Brands Limited is R325.38 (as of Jul 16, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is R280.14.
What is the quality score of TBS?
Tiger Brands Limited has a Quality Score of 72/100. It measures business quality (profitability, growth, cash flow, balance-sheet strength, investment discipline, share issuance). Market factors such as price momentum and volatility do not enter the number; they are shown separately in the detail view.
What is the revenue of Tiger Brands Limited (TBS)?
Tiger Brands Limited reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about 34.6B ZAR (latest available figure, as of Jul 16, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of TBS?
The net profit margin of Tiger Brands Limited is about 9.6%, meaning it keeps roughly 9.6% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.
Does Tiger Brands Limited pay a dividend?
Tiger Brands Limited currently shows a dividend yield of about 0.06% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 16, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data, nothing guessed.

14 days Pro free · no card

Track Tiger Brands Limited and try Pro for 14 days

One email gets you 14 days of full Pro (review alerts, the 35,000+ stock screener, the diversification check) plus the monthly Top-25 report of the most undervalued quality stocks. No card, cancel anytime.

Zero risk: nothing is ever charged. After 14 days you decide whether to stay.