Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

United Fire Group (UFCS) Fair Value & Analysis

Financial Services · US · Market cap $1.3B

Price$51.06
Fair Value$59.89
Upside+17.3%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range $44.92 – $74.86

Analysis

United Fire Group (UFCS) currently trades at $51.06, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is $59.89 — implying the stock looks roughly 17.3% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Financial Services sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

United Fire Group, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, engages in writing property and casualty insurance in the United States. It provides property and casualty insurance, and surety bonds; and fire and allied lines, other liability, automobile, workers' compensation, and surety to small business owners and middle market businesses operating in industries, such as construction, services, retail trade, financial, and manufacturing. The company also offers marine specialty, professional liability, and earthquake coverages; specialty and surplus lines coverage; and reinsurance coverage for property and casualty insurance. It sells its products through a network of independent agencies. United Fire Group, Inc. was incorporated in 1946 and is headquartered in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.