1450 (1450) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$1.0B

1 1450 1450 · HK

PriceHK$0.7100

Fair ValueHK$1.65

Upside+132.4%

Quality55/100

Watch 1450 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$1.24 – HK$2.07

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 24 valuation models · updated today

Share price −13.9% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.6557 – HK$1.16 · fair‑value band HK$1.24 – HK$2.07 · the HK$0.7100 price screens below the HK$1.65 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1450 (1450) currently trades at HK$0.7100, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$1.65 — implying the stock looks roughly 132.4% undervalued today. We read business quality at 55/100 (solid quality), in the Technology sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1450 generated revenue of HK$1.5B at a net margin of 6.1%. Revenue grew 38.1% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 19.0%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$255M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$1.5B

Revenue growth (YoY) +38.1%

Net margin 6.1%

Return on equity 19.0%

Free cash flow HK$351M FY2025

P/E ratio 9.3

More key figures

Operating margin 6.7%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0400

Dividend yield 6.3%

EPS growth (YoY) -30.4%

Net cash HK$255M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1450 reported revenue of HK$1.5B in FY2025 versus HK$203M in FY2021, a compound +64.5%/yr. Reported net income was HK$90.2M in FY2025.

Revenue +64.5%/yr

FY21 HK$203M

FY22 HK$426M

FY23 HK$1.1B

FY24 HK$1.3B

FY25 HK$1.5B

Net income

FY21 −HK$61.6M

FY22 −HK$9.2M

FY23 HK$119M

FY24 HK$81.7M

FY25 HK$90.2M

Is 1450 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Software - Application stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
SAP SE SAPP34	R$769.00	R$120.02	-84%
Salesforce, Inc CRM	$150.12	$299.82	+100%
Uber Technologies, Inc UBER	$70.71	$90.28	+28%
Shopify Inc SHOP	$108.20	$30.42	-72%
ServiceNow, Inc NOW	$106.06	$35.40	-67%
Cadence Design Systems, Inc CDNS	$411.68	$71.08	-83%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1450 (1450) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$1.65 versus a price of HK$0.7100 — about +132% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1450?

Our model-based fair value for 1450 is HK$1.65 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.7100.

What is the quality score of 1450?

1450 has a Quality Score of 55/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1450 (1450)?

1450 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$1.5B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1450?

The net profit margin of 1450 is about 6.1%, meaning it keeps roughly 6.1% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1450 pay a dividend?

1450 currently shows a dividend yield of about 6.34% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.