1692 (1692) Fair Value & Analysis

Technology · Market cap HK$538M

1 1692 1692 · HK

PriceHK$1.50

Fair ValueHK$3.56

Upside+137.3%

Quality61/100

Watch 1692 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$2.70 – HK$4.42

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 25 valuation models · updated today

Share price −9.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$1.48 – HK$2.50 · fair‑value band HK$2.70 – HK$4.42 · the HK$1.50 price screens below the HK$3.56 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1692 (1692) currently trades at HK$1.50, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$3.56 — implying the stock looks roughly 137.3% undervalued today. We read business quality at 61/100 (solid quality), in the Technology sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1692 generated revenue of HK$673M at a net margin of 9.3%. Revenue declined 14.0% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 18.0%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$44.4M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$673M

Revenue growth (YoY) -14.0%

Net margin 9.3%

Return on equity 18.0%

Free cash flow HK$136M FY2025

P/E ratio 8.8

More key figures

Operating margin 11.6%

EPS (TTM) HK$0.0800

Dividend yield 9.7%

EPS growth (YoY) -45.0%

Net cash HK$44.4M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1692 reported revenue of HK$673M in FY2025 versus HK$763M in FY2021, a compound −3.1%/yr. Reported net income was HK$62.6M in FY2025, compounding −12.4%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue −3.1%/yr

FY21 HK$763M

FY22 HK$824M

FY23 HK$704M

FY24 HK$704M

FY25 HK$673M

Net income −12.4%/yr

FY21 HK$107M

FY22 HK$134M

FY23 HK$122M

FY24 HK$108M

FY25 HK$62.6M

Is 1692 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Consumer Electronics stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
Apple Inc AAPL	$311.23	$86.29	-72%
Samsung Electronics Co 005930	317,000 KRW	119,421 KRW	-62%
Sony Group SNEJF	$19.65	$23.06	+17%
Xiaomi Corporation 1810N	64.00 MXN	32.79 MXN	-49%
Panasonic Holdings PCRHY	$27.30	$10.25	-62%
LG Electronics Inc 066570	227,500 KRW	91,371 KRW	-60%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Technology stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1692 (1692) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$3.56 versus a price of HK$1.50 — about +137% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 1692?

Our model-based fair value for 1692 is HK$3.56 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$1.50.

What is the quality score of 1692?

1692 has a Quality Score of 61/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 1692 (1692)?

1692 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$673M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 1692?

The net profit margin of 1692 is about 9.3%, meaning it keeps roughly 9.3% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

Does 1692 pay a dividend?

1692 currently shows a dividend yield of about 9.67% relative to its recent price (as of Jul 2, 2026).

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.