Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1758 (1758) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · Market cap HK$114M

1 1758 1758 · HK
PriceHK$0.1250
Fair ValueHK$0.0600
Upside-52.0%
Quality26/100
Watch 1758 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.0400 – HK$0.0900

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 2 valuation models · updated today

Share price +30.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.1700 HK$0.0660 Fair Value HK$0.0600 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.0660 – HK$0.1700 · fair‑value band HK$0.0400 – HK$0.0900 · the HK$0.1250 price screens above the HK$0.0600 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1758 (1758) currently trades at HK$0.1250, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.0600 — implying the stock looks roughly 52.0% overvalued today. We read business quality at 26/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1758 generated revenue of HK$352M at a net margin of -46.1%. Revenue declined 12.9% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -63.7%. Net debt stands at HK$1.8B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$352M
Revenue growth (YoY) -12.9%
Net margin -46.1%
Return on equity -63.7%
Free cash flow −HK$272M FY2025
Operating margin -11.9%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.1400
EPS growth (YoY) +1,148%
Net debt HK$1.8B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1758 reported revenue of HK$375M in FY2025 versus HK$0 in FY2021. Reported net income was −HK$130M in FY2025.

Revenue
FY21 HK$0
FY22 HK$33.6M
FY23 HK$81.3M
FY24 HK$430M
FY25 HK$375M
Net income
FY21 −HK$629M
FY22 −HK$9.4M
FY23 HK$51.0M
FY24 −HK$39.6M
FY25 −HK$130M

Is 1758 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Education & Training Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
New Oriental Education & Technology Group EDUN 966.48 MXN 895.77 MXN -7%
9901 9901 HK$36.30 HK$4.84 -87%
TAL Education Group T1AL34 R$4.84 R$0.5800 -88%
Graham Holdings GHC $1,147 $1,170 +2%
Laureate Education, Inc LAUR $37.19 $41.45 +11%
Covista Inc CVSA $119.28 $137.46 +15%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1758 (1758) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.0600 versus a price of HK$0.1250 — about −52% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1758?
Our model-based fair value for 1758 is HK$0.0600 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.1250.
What is the quality score of 1758?
1758 has a Quality Score of 26/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1758 (1758)?
1758 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$352M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1758?
The net profit margin of 1758 is about -46.1%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.