Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1871 (1871) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · Market cap HK$146M

1 1871 1871 · HK
PriceHK$0.3350
Fair ValueHK$0.4000
Upside+19.4%
Quality58/100
Watch 1871 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.3400 – HK$0.4500

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 5 valuation models · updated today

Share price −11.8% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.3900 HK$0.1910 Fair Value HK$0.4000 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1910 – HK$0.3900 · fair‑value band HK$0.3400 – HK$0.4500 · the HK$0.3350 price screens below the HK$0.4000 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1871 (1871) currently trades at HK$0.3350, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.4000 — implying the stock looks roughly 19.4% undervalued today. We read business quality at 58/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1871 generated revenue of HK$32.8M at a net margin of -30.8%. Revenue grew 11.5% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -5.6%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$70.2M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$32.8M
Revenue growth (YoY) +11.5%
Net margin -30.8%
Return on equity -5.6%
Free cash flow −HK$639K FY2025
Operating margin -32.5%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$-0.0100
EPS growth (YoY) -98.6%
Net cash HK$70.2M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1871 reported revenue of HK$32.8M in FY2025 versus HK$67.2M in FY2021, a compound −16.4%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$10.1M in FY2025.

Revenue −16.4%/yr
FY21 HK$67.2M
FY22 HK$47.7M
FY23 HK$39.9M
FY24 HK$32.3M
FY25 HK$32.8M
Net income
FY21 −HK$3.5M
FY22 −HK$8.7M
FY23 −HK$8.4M
FY24 −HK$8.4M
FY25 −HK$10.1M

Is 1871 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Education & Training Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
New Oriental Education & Technology Group EDUN 966.48 MXN 895.77 MXN -7%
9901 9901 HK$36.30 HK$4.84 -87%
TAL Education Group T1AL34 R$4.84 R$0.5800 -88%
Graham Holdings GHC $1,147 $1,170 +2%
Laureate Education, Inc LAUR $33.82 $33.05 -2%
Covista Inc CVSA $119.28 $137.46 +15%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1871 (1871) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.4000 versus a price of HK$0.3350 — about +19% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1871?
Our model-based fair value for 1871 is HK$0.4000 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.3350.
What is the quality score of 1871?
1871 has a Quality Score of 58/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1871 (1871)?
1871 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$32.8M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1871?
The net profit margin of 1871 is about -30.8%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.