Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1927 (1927) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · Market cap HK$173M

1 1927 1927 · HK
PriceHK$0.2180
Fair ValueHK$0.3000
Upside+37.6%
Quality65/100
Watch 1927 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Medium Range HK$0.1500 – HK$0.4600

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 14 valuation models · updated today

Share price −9.5% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.2550 HK$0.1010 Fair Value HK$0.3000 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.1010 – HK$0.2550 · fair‑value band HK$0.1500 – HK$0.4600 · the HK$0.2180 price screens below the HK$0.3000 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1927 (1927) currently trades at HK$0.2180, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.3000 — implying the stock looks roughly 37.6% undervalued today. We read business quality at 65/100 (solid quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: medium) — always confirm before acting.

Over the trailing twelve months, 1927 generated revenue of HK$308M at a net margin of -2.5%. Revenue grew 9.1% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -1.9%. Net debt stands at HK$252M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$308M
Revenue growth (YoY) +9.1%
Net margin -2.5%
Return on equity -1.9%
Free cash flow HK$31.7M FY2025
Operating margin -3.7%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$0.0200
EPS growth (YoY) -47.8%
Net debt HK$252M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1927 reported revenue of HK$300M in FY2025 versus HK$410M in FY2021, a compound −7.5%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$7.4M in FY2025.

Revenue −7.5%/yr
FY21 HK$410M
FY22 HK$376M
FY23 HK$352M
FY24 HK$315M
FY25 HK$300M
Net income
FY21 HK$27.3M
FY22 HK$16.1M
FY23 HK$4.9M
FY24 −HK$3.6M
FY25 −HK$7.4M

Is 1927 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Confectioners stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG LISN CHF 94,300 CHF 8,228 -91%
MDLZ MDLZ 1,104 MXN 33.78 MXN -97%
Mondelez International, Inc MDLZ34 R$165.92 R$98.18 -41%
The Hershey Company HSY $176.61 $126.21 -29%
Barry Callebaut AG BARN CHF 1,128 CHF 654.80 -42%
ORION Corp 271560 132,500 KRW 184,578 KRW +39%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1927 (1927) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.3000 versus a price of HK$0.2180 — about +38% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1927?
Our model-based fair value for 1927 is HK$0.3000 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.2180.
What is the quality score of 1927?
1927 has a Quality Score of 65/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1927 (1927)?
1927 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$308M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1927?
The net profit margin of 1927 is about -2.5%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.