Fair Value Calculator Fair Value Calculator
EN DE

1971 (1971) Fair Value & Analysis

Real Estate · Market cap HK$131M

1 1971 1971 · HK
PriceHK$0.3150
Fair ValueHK$0.2862
Upside-9.1%
Quality47/100
Watch 1971 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free
Evidence: Low Range HK$0.2263 – HK$0.3461

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 6 valuation models · updated today

Share price −7.4% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

HK$0.4450 HK$0.2550 Fair Value HK$0.2862 Jun 2025 Jul 2026

12‑month range HK$0.2550 – HK$0.4450 · fair‑value band HK$0.2263 – HK$0.3461 · the HK$0.3150 price screens above the HK$0.2862 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

1971 (1971) currently trades at HK$0.3150, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.2862 — implying the stock looks roughly 9.1% overvalued today. We read business quality at 47/100 (below-average quality), in the Real Estate sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

Over the trailing twelve months, 1971 generated revenue of HK$951M at a net margin of -4.1%. Revenue declined 21.4% year over year. It earns a return on equity of -3.7%. The balance sheet holds a net cash position of HK$398M. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$951M
Revenue growth (YoY) -21.4%
Net margin -4.1%
Return on equity -3.7%
Free cash flow −HK$140M FY2025
Operating margin 2.8%
More key figures
EPS (TTM) HK$0.0600
EPS growth (YoY) -33.2%
Net cash HK$398M FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

1971 reported revenue of HK$951M in FY2025 versus HK$1.1B in FY2021, a compound −4.2%/yr. Reported net income was −HK$38.5M in FY2025.

Revenue −4.2%/yr
FY21 HK$1.1B
FY22 HK$1.1B
FY23 HK$1.1B
FY24 HK$1.0B
FY25 HK$951M
Net income
FY21 HK$128M
FY22 HK$92.0M
FY23 HK$10.9M
FY24 HK$14.4M
FY25 −HK$38.5M

Is 1971 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Real Estate Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock Price Fair Value vs Fair Value
Vingroup Joint Stock Company VIC 196,000 VND 52,975 VND -73%
CBRE Group CBRE $127.86 $81.43 -36%
2423 2423 HK$38.90 HK$17.91 -54%
1972 1972 HK$20.40 HK$18.75 -8%
1209 1209 HK$36.68 HK$34.70 -5%
Plaza S.A MALLPLAZA 3,800 CLP 5,905 CLP +55%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Real Estate stocks →

All undervalued stocks TechnologyFinancial ServicesHealthcareConsumer CyclicalConsumer DefensiveCommunication ServicesIndustrialsEnergyBasic MaterialsReal EstateUtilities Deeply Undervalued StocksUndervalued Blue-Chip StocksUndervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 1971 (1971) undervalued?
As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.2862 versus a price of HK$0.3150 — about −9% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 1971?
Our model-based fair value for 1971 is HK$0.2862 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.3150.
What is the quality score of 1971?
1971 has a Quality Score of 47/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.
What is the revenue of 1971 (1971)?
1971 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$951M (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).
What is the net profit margin of 1971?
The net profit margin of 1971 is about -4.1%, meaning it is currently running at a net loss. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.