2001 (2001) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · Market cap HK$1.2B

2 2001 2001 · HK

PriceHK$0.5900

Fair ValueHK$0.5871

Upside-0.5%

Quality39/100

Watch 2001 for free — get notified when fair value or trend changes. Watch for free

Evidence: High Range HK$0.3829 – HK$1.01

Fair value as of: Jul 2, 2026

From 26 valuation models · updated today

Share price −13.2% over the past month.

Price vs Fair Value (12 months)

12‑month range HK$0.5700 – HK$1.42 · fair‑value band HK$0.3829 – HK$1.01 · the HK$0.5900 price screens above the HK$0.5871 fair value. As of Jul 2, 2026.

✦ Which stocks are undervalued right now? Check free Discover now →

Analysis

2001 (2001) currently trades at HK$0.5900, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is HK$0.5871 — implying the stock looks roughly 0.5% overvalued today. We read business quality at 39/100 (below-average quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: high).

Over the trailing twelve months, 2001 generated revenue of HK$2.6B at a net margin of 31.6%. Revenue grew 2.6% year over year. It earns a return on equity of 16.6%. Net debt stands at HK$1.4B. Fundamentals as of Jul 2, 2026

Key figures & financial health

Revenue (TTM) HK$2.6B

Revenue growth (YoY) +2.6%

Net margin 31.6%

Return on equity 16.6%

Free cash flow HK$565M FY2025

P/E ratio 1.6

More key figures

Operating margin 31.7%

EPS growth (YoY) -21.2%

Net debt HK$1.4B FY2025

Figures from reported company fundamentals (EODHD) · as of Jul 2, 2026. TTM = trailing twelve months.

Revenue & earnings trend

FY2021 – FY2025 · reported fiscal years

2001 reported revenue of HK$2.6B in FY2025 versus HK$1.5B in FY2021, a compound +14.5%/yr. Reported net income was HK$820M in FY2025, compounding +9.6%/yr from FY2021.

Revenue +14.5%/yr

FY21 HK$1.5B

FY22 HK$1.9B

FY23 HK$2.1B

FY24 HK$2.4B

FY25 HK$2.6B

Net income +9.6%/yr

FY21 HK$568M

FY22 HK$620M

FY23 HK$703M

FY24 HK$756M

FY25 HK$820M

Is 2001 fairly valued? → Check now

Similar stocks

6 more Education & Training Services stocks, each showing price versus our Fair Value estimate (as of Jul 2, 2026).

Stock	Price	Fair Value	vs Fair Value
New Oriental Education & Technology Group EDUN	966.48 MXN	894.16 MXN	-7%
9901 9901	HK$36.30	HK$4.84	-87%
TAL Education Group T1AL34	R$4.89	R$0.9200	-81%
Graham Holdings GHC	$1,141	$1,253	+10%
Laureate Education, Inc LAUR	$36.49	$39.86	+9%
Covista Inc CVSA	$124.45	$150.42	+21%

Explore undervalued stocks

More undervalued Consumer Defensive stocks →

All undervalued stocks Technology Financial Services Healthcare Consumer Cyclical Consumer Defensive Communication Services Industrials Energy Basic Materials Real Estate Utilities Deeply Undervalued Stocks Undervalued Blue-Chip Stocks Undervalued Small-Cap Stocks

Frequently asked questions

Is 2001 (2001) undervalued?

As of Jul 2, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of HK$0.5871 versus a price of HK$0.5900 — about −0% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.

What is the fair value of 2001?

Our model-based fair value for 2001 is HK$0.5871 (as of Jul 2, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is HK$0.5900.

What is the quality score of 2001?

2001 has a Quality Score of 39/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

What is the revenue of 2001 (2001)?

2001 reported trailing-twelve-month revenue of about HK$2.6B (latest available figure, as of Jul 2, 2026).

What is the net profit margin of 2001?

The net profit margin of 2001 is about 31.6%, meaning it keeps roughly 31.6% of revenue as net income. Based on the latest reported figures.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.