Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

NAU Robotics Co (459510) Fair Value & Analysis

Industrials · KR · Market cap 242B KRW

Price15,180 KRW
Fair Value5,632 KRW
Upside-62.9%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range 4,224 KRW – 7,040 KRW

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

NAU Robotics Co (459510) currently trades at 15,180 KRW, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is 5,632 KRW — implying the stock looks roughly 62.9% overvalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Industrials sector. Bear case: priced above our estimate, the market already discounts strong expectations. Bull case: above-average quality can justify a premium — the entry price still matters most (evidence: low).

About the company

NAU Robotics Co.,Ltd develops industrial robots in South Korea. It offers robots for smart factory, automation, and various industrial applications; multi-joint robots for plastic injection molding; and industrial safety fences. The company was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Incheon, South Korea.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

GE Vernova Inc (GEV) -84% SIEGY (SIEGY) -43% SMAWF (SMAWF) -43% SMNS (SMNS) -28% SIE (SIE) -44% Schneider Electric S.E. (SBGSF) -56%

Frequently asked questions

Is NAU Robotics Co (459510) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of 5,632 KRW versus a price of 15,180 KRW — about −63% (overvalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of 459510?
Our 21-model fair value for NAU Robotics Co is 5,632 KRW (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is 15,180 KRW.
What is the quality score of 459510?
NAU Robotics Co has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.