Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Canterbury Resources Limited (CBY) Fair Value & Analysis

Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$12.8M

PriceA$0.0420
Fair ValueA$0.1200
Upside+185.7%
Quality95/100
Evidence: Low Range A$0.0900 – A$0.1500

Fair value as of: Jun 25, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Canterbury Resources Limited (CBY) currently trades at A$0.0420, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.1200 — implying the stock looks roughly 185.7% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Canterbury Resources Limited explores mineral properties in Australia and Papua New Guinea. It explores for copper, molybdenum, silver, and gold deposits. Canterbury Resources Limited was incorporated in 2011 and is headquartered in Pyrmont, Australia.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

Fresnillo plc (FRES) +26% Valterra Platinum Limited (ANGPY) -41% Hecla Mining Company (HCL) -41% Impala Platinum Holdings (IMPUY) -87% Northam Platinum Holdings (NPTLF) -85% Compañía de Minas Buenaventura S.A. (BVN) -11%

Frequently asked questions

Is Canterbury Resources Limited (CBY) undervalued?
As of Jun 25, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of A$0.1200 versus a price of A$0.0420 — about +186% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CBY?
Our 21-model fair value for Canterbury Resources Limited is A$0.1200 (as of Jun 25, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is A$0.0420.
What is the quality score of CBY?
Canterbury Resources Limited has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.