Fairvalue-Calculator Fairvalue-Calculator
EN DE

Cedergrenska AB (CEDER) Fair Value & Analysis

Consumer Defensive · SE · Market cap 557M SEK

Pricekr 44.80
Fair Valuekr 48.05
Upside+7.3%
Quality95/100
Evidence: High Range kr 34.54 – kr 61.56

Fair value as of: Jun 24, 2026

✦ Find undervalued quality stocks — 34,000+ analysed Find stocks →

Analysis

Cedergrenska AB (CEDER) currently trades at kr 44.80, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is kr 48.05 — implying the stock looks roughly 7.3% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Consumer Defensive sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: high) — always confirm before acting.

About the company

Cedergrenska AB (publ) provides education services in Sweden. It operates preschool, elementary, and upper secondary schools, as well as operates gymnasiums and adult education centers. Cedergrenska AB (publ) was founded in 2017 and is headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.

Open the full interactive analysis →

Similar stocks

New Oriental Education & Technology Group (EDUN) -95% TAL Education Group (T1AL34) -81% Graham Holdings (GHC) +9% Laureate Education, Inc (LAUR) +13% Covista Inc (CVSA) +15% Stride, Inc (LRN) +68%

Frequently asked questions

Is Cedergrenska AB (CEDER) undervalued?
As of Jun 24, 2026, our model estimates a fair value of kr 48.05 versus a price of kr 44.80 — about +7% (undervalued). Model-based estimate, not financial advice.
What is the fair value of CEDER?
Our 21-model fair value for Cedergrenska AB is kr 48.05 (as of Jun 24, 2026), built from audited fundamentals. The current price is kr 44.80.
What is the quality score of CEDER?
Cedergrenska AB has a Quality Score of 95/100, measuring profitability, growth and balance-sheet strength from non-valuation factors.

How we calculate Fair Value

Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.

Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.