Carbonxt Group (CG1) Fair Value & Analysis
Basic Materials · AU · Market cap A$30.3M
Fair value as of: Jun 26, 2026
Analysis
Carbonxt Group (CG1) currently trades at A$0.0560, while our model-based Fair Value estimate is A$0.2318 — implying the stock looks roughly 314.0% undervalued today. We read business quality at 95/100 (high quality), in the Basic Materials sector. Bull case: trading below our estimate, it may offer upside if the fundamentals hold. Bear case: a low price can be a value trap when quality is weak or the data is thin (evidence: low) — always confirm before acting.
About the company
Carbonxt Group Limited, a cleantech company, develops, markets, and sells specialized activated carbon (AC) products for the removal of pollutants and toxins in industrial processes in the United States. The company offers powdered activated carbon and AC pellets. Its products are used for industrial air purification, wastewater treatment, and other liquid and gas phase markets for the capture of mercury and sulphur to reduce harmful emissions into the atmosphere. The company serves coal-fired power plants, cement plants, industrial boiler and incinerators, portable water, nutrient recovery technology, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, and VOC and hydrogen sulfide removal industries. Carbonxt Group Limited was incorporated in 2001 and is headquartered in Sydney, Australia.
Open the full interactive analysis →
Similar stocks
Frequently asked questions
Is Carbonxt Group (CG1) undervalued?
What is the fair value of CG1?
What is the quality score of CG1?
How we calculate Fair Value
Each company is valued through a stack of independent intrinsic-value models (DCF variants, residual-income, multiples and more), blended into one family-balanced consensus and weighted by how much trustworthy data backs it. A separate quality layer scores the fundamentals. Every input is real reported data — nothing guessed.
Educational research only · not financial advice · no buy/sell recommendation. Model-based estimates are not certainties; their reliability depends on data quality and assumptions.